Abstract
AbstractIn the Met Office Unified Model prognostic cloud scheme (PC2), thermodynamic variability is represented by considering two distributions, based on the properties of the clear and cloudy portions of the grid‐box. To calculate a cloud fraction increment, the equation set needs to be closed. The closure assumption determines how these two distributions are blended together at the saturation boundary. The current closure is reviewed. In the limit of vanishing liquid condensate, this can lead to very tall but narrow probability distribution functions (PDFs). At present, the two parts of the PDF are weighted based on the area under their curves. As a result, these very tall PDFs are allowed to contribute significantly, since their area is finite. This closure is shown to sometimes lead to unphysically large cloud fraction changes. However, they are prevented from affecting the model evolution by being overwritten if their magnitude is unrealistically large. A new blending closure is proposed. This weighs the two PDFs based on their widths. The contribution of very tall, but narrow, PDFs is hence drastically reduced. While this removes the undesirable need for overwriting unrealistic increments, it is shown that overall model performance did not improve or worsen.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.