Abstract
We reported recently that total iron-binding capacity (TIBC) values calculated from serum iron and unsaturated iron-binding capacity (UIBC) values were significantly lower than those obtained by a direct and fully automated TIBC assay (1)(2). We also reported that slopes of regression lines for calculated TIBC values plotted against serum transferrin (TRF) were ∼7% lower than the theoretical ratio of TIBC to TRF (TIBC/TRF = 25.1 μmol/g). We found that this could be attributed to underestimation of UIBC values by colorimetric methods. One possible reason for underestimation of UIBC values was insufficient saturation of TRF. We modified the assay conditions of a colorimetric method for UIBC measurement to improve the correspondence between TIBC values converted from TRF and those calculated from serum iron and UIBC. Both serum iron and UIBC were determined by colorimetric methods (Wako Pure Chemical Industries) with a Hitachi Model 7070 automated analyzer. Serum TRF concentrations were determined by a nephelometric assay on a Behring Nephelometer II analyzer (Dade Behring). UIBC values were determined by four modified methods (Table 1⇓ ). UIBCA was …
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.