Abstract

Additive manufacturing is one of the most popular technological processes and is being considered in many research works, a lot of which are related to thin-walled parts analysis. There are many cases where different part geometries were manufactured using the same process parameters. That kind of approach often causes different porosity and surface roughness values in the geometry of each produced part. In this work, the porosity of thin-walled and monolithic parts was compared. To analyze additively manufactured samples, porosity and microstructural analyses were done. Additionally, to check the influence of process parameter modification on the manufactured parts’ properties, hardness and roughness measurements were made. Surface roughness and the influence of surface treatment were also taken into account. Porosity reduction of thin-walled parts with energy density growth was observed. Additionally, a positive influence of slight energy density growth on the surface roughness of produced parts was registered. Comparing two extreme-parameter groups, it was observed that a 56% energy density increase caused an almost 85% decrease in porosity and a 45% increase in surface roughness. Additional surface treatment of the material allowed for a 70–90% roughness reduction.

Highlights

  • Additive manufacturing is currently one of the most popular topics of different research papers [1].There are many publications connected with different types of analysis

  • The material used for sample manufacturing was gas-atomized 316L stainless steel powder weight characterized by a spherical shape supplied by Solutions AG company

  • For each porosity result an area of the analyzed thin-walled structure has has been attached

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Additive manufacturing is currently one of the most popular topics of different research papers [1]. The phenomenon of heat transfer is strictly related to molten pool behavior during the L-PBF process, which in turns affects void generation It has been described by Gusarov et al [22], where authors point to transfer of the laser radiation in powder as being responsible for the production of volumetric heat. The presence of significant differences between the properties of monolithic and thin-walled parts obtained using the same material and additive manufacturing technology is considered in this paper. It determines how the manufacturing process of thin-walled parts affects the microstructure and porosity of that type of element. Theand presence of significant differences between the properties of monolithic and thin-walled

Materials
Material
Additive
Material Properties Analysis
Samples
Porosity
Surface Roughness Analysis
Surface roughness in samples
Surface Treatment
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.