Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the image quality and dose performance of a new 85 cm 16‐slice CTscanner with a standard 70 cm 16‐slice CTscanner from the same company (Philips Medical Systems, Cleveland, Ohio), both used in a radiationoncology setting. Method and Materials:Image quality and dose performance tests were performed on a new 85 cm bore 16‐slice CTscanner (Brilliance Big Bore) and a 70 cm bore 16‐slice CTscanner (Brilliance 16 Power). The image quality tests were performed using the manufacturer‐supplied phantoms provided with each scanner, as well as with a commercially available CTimage performance phantom. The following tests were performed to evaluate image quality: slice width accuracy, CT number accuracy and linearity, CT number uniformity and noise, low contrast resolution, and high contrast (spatial) resolution. The computed tomography dose index(CTDI) measurements were performed using a standard CTdose phantom. The same head and body protocols were used for both scanners. To validate our results, images were sent to a third party company for independent analysis. Results: Slice width accuracy was within acceptable limits (±0.5 mm). Both scanners exhibited comparable CT number uniformity, accuracy, and linearity. The 85 cm bore scanner showed slightly higher noise. With equivalent mAs settings, large bore scanner low contrast resolution was comparable to the conventional scanner. High contrast resolution between the two scanners also demonstrated minimal differences. The head and body CTDI was 0.5–1.0 cGy higher with the 85 cm bore than for the standard 70 cm bore scanner.Conclusion: The overall image quality and dose performance of the new 85 cm bore 16‐slice CTscanner are comparable to those of the standard 70 cm bore diagnostic quality multislice scanner. Therefore, the new big bore CT is appropriate for diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy applications.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.