MODES OF REPRODUCTION IN RUGOSE CORALS

Abstract

A consideration of reproduction among fossil compound and ‘solitary’ rugose corals leads to the conclusion that(1) compound corals belonging to the order Rugosa must have been dimorphic and alternated between an asexual generation and a sexual generation; and (2) ‘solitary’ forms of rugose corals, although dominantly sexually-reproducing, included some individuals in which evidence of a repressed asexual generation is present. The presence of a sexually-reproducing generation among compound corals cannot be demonstrated by clear morphological evidence, but is deduced from the observation that this is the most likely explanation for the origin of the initial corallite (‘protocorallite’) of a compound corallum. It is proposed to restrict the term ‘solitary’ to non-compound individual corallites in which asexual budding is not observed and which therefore are presumed to have reproduced sexually. Simple corallites in which budding is observable are referred to as ‘simple budding’ forms. Thus, several described species of non-colonial rugose corals include both solitary individuals and simple budding individuals, including ‘Lonsdaleoides’ nishikawai Hayasaka & Minato, Timania rainbowensis Rowett, and ‘Clisaxophyllum’ awa atetsuense Minato & Nakazawa.