Abstract
The article off ers an exposition of the philosophical problematization of modernity. The author consid-ers three possible models for the thematization of modernity in the perspective of the Kantian formulation of the problem: 1) ontological, associated with the project of M. Heidegger, where the question of the historical time of modernity is pushed into the background, while the question of temporality of human existence. At the same time, the question of modernity becomes universal and must be eliminated in the future; 2) anthropological, which con-sists in preserving the pragmatic perspective of considering a person, which implies a rejection of ontology, but opens up prospects for the development of the humanities. Here the question of modernity is not eliminated, but is transferred to the fi eld of historical epistemology; 3) postmodernist, associated with the elimination of the question of man, where modernity again appears as a unique event, but left in the past. The author records the insuffi ciency of both projects for the revival of metaphysics and programs for creating traumatic history, which equally reproduce the anthropological confi guration of philosophy, and concludes that it is necessary to develop a new model of modernity — an aesthetic one.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
