Abstract
This paper questions the popular binary conception of ‘citizens and subjects’ by Mahmood Mamdani (1996) as a legitimate basis of characterizing indigenous governance systems in Africa. Whilst the history of colonial manipulation of local governance systems is acknowledged, together with how this was twisted to serve colonial ends, this paper questions the observed vulnerability of academic discourse to the ‘invention theory’ which subjects all surviving indigenous forms and systems to colonial invention. This paper is a critical analysis of the intellectualization of political existentialism of African people’s history to pronounce on the state of their lives. It argues that scholars have put the cart before the horse in suggesting that the institutionalized segregation of political life in South Africa legitimately created ‘citizens with rights’ versus ‘subjects with custom’.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
