Abstract

The article offers an analysis of the most influential modern theories of religion. The theory of secularization is associated with the classical theory of modernization. The theory of individualization of religion is associated with theories of social action, albeit indirectly. Likewise, it is connected with the theory of communicative action by Jürgen Habermas, and there is also a direct association with theories of individualization and privatization. The theory of the market model of religion is directly associated with the theory of the market for demand and supply, and the theory of post-industrial society is associated with the theory of secularization indirectly. In addition, various theories are gaining recognition. Among them is the postsecularism associated with the theory of postindustrial society, as well as postnonclassical (postmodernist and postpositivist) approach. Modern theories of religion are analysed from the point of view of the emerging system-communication approach, which is based upon the communicative approach theory by Jürgen Habermas, and the theory of self-reference social systems by Niklas Luhmann. The author suggests, while being within the framework of the neoclassical model of scientific rationality, to move away from the theories by Habermas and Luhmann. He suggests a new understanding of religious communication, in terms of its logical interconnection and interdependence with other forms of communication, primarily social, political, ethnic and cultural.

Highlights

  • The theory of individualization of religion is associated with theories of social action, albeit indirectly

  • It is connected with the theory of communicative action by Jürgen Habermas, and there is a direct association with theories of individualization and privatization

  • The theory of the market model of religion is directly associated with the theory of the market for demand and supply, and the theory of post-industrial society is associated with the theory of secularization indirectly

Read more

Summary

Original Paper Оригинальная статья

Теория секуляризации (Secularization Theory) связана с классической модернизационной теорией; теория индивидуализации религии (Individualization Theory) – с теориями социального действия (опосредованно), в том числе теорией коммуникативного действия Юргена Хабермаса, теориями индивидуализации и приватизации (непосредственно); теория рыночной модели религии (Market Model of Religion) – с теорией рынка, ориентированной на спрос и предложение (непосредственно) и теорией постиндустриального общества (опосредованно). Идеи Хабермаса и Лумана легли в основу системно-коммуникационного подхода, который в неоклассической модели научной рациональности предлагает свое осмысление религии и религиозной коммуникации. Теория секуляризации (Sucularization Theory) связана с классической модернизационной теорией; теория индивидуализации религии (Individualization Theory) – с теориями социального действия (опосредованно), в том числе теорией коммуникативного действия Юргена Хабермаса, теориями индивидуализации и приватизации (непосредственно); теория рыночной модели религии (Market Model of Religion) – с теорией рынка, ориентированной на спрос и предложение (непосредственно), и теорией постиндустриального общества (опосредовано). Все большее признание получают теории, апеллирующие к постсекуляризму (Postsecularism), связанные с теорией постиндустриального общества и постнеклассическими (постмодернистскими и постпозитивистскими) подходами

Теория секуляризации
Теория индивидуализации религии
Теория постсекуляризма
Системная и когнитивная теории религии
От Хабермаса и Лумана к новому пониманию особенностей религиозной коммуникации
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.