Modern Magic, the Illusion of Transformation, and How It Was Done

Abstract

Abstract In 1584, Reginald Scot claimed that jugglers who performed magic tricks were mistaken for witches. The claim was repeated and later became the basis of the Victorian idea of “modern magic.” According to stage conjurors and writers on magic, “modern magic” was magic that was (now) understood to be an illusion. The claim continued to be repeated by amateur historians of magic, who reinforced this idea of “modern magic” by citing cases of early modern jugglers who were persecuted as witches. In recent years, “modern magic,” as a distinctly modern form of magic that was understood to be an illusion, has become part of modern cultural history. The view that magic tricks were mistaken for witchcraft, however, is not to be found in the historiography of the early modern period. Indeed, it is a myth. When one examines how magic tricks and witchcraft were compared, one sees that there was a clear distinction made between the two. Nevertheless, despite the lack of evidence, the myth continued to survive. It was used to justify the exposure of secrets, enhanced Victorian conjurors’ respectability, and it fitted neatly within the modern narrative of rational progress. It persisted due to the uncritical reading of sources by some historians, whose examples of persecution were the result of misinterpretation. Thus, “modern magic,” as a form of magic that was understood to be an illusion, was not a particularly modern phenomenon. Indeed, despite some changes in how magic was experienced, early modern views of magic were remarkably similar to modern ones.