Abstract

Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) selectively achieves high drug exposure of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Such pharmacologic advantage has doubled the response rate of liver metastases on fluoropyrimidines (FP) delivered as HAI rather than intravenously, in a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials (RCT). However, the improvement in antitumour efficacy did not consistently translate into any significant survival advantage across all randomised studies. However, the results of this meta-analysis should be cautiously interpreted due to the heterogeneity of the studies, inadequate study designs, obsolete therapy and high rate of early treatment discontinuation due to HAI technical failures or hepato-biliary toxicity. Most studies actually were performed before year 2000 and did not integrate the considerable progresses accomplished in the management of CRC, such as multidrug regimens instead of single agent FP and secondary resection of metastases, a major contributing factor for prolonged survival. Furthermore, the systemic exposure of patients given HAI was low without concomitant IV therapy, facilitating extra-hepatic relapses. The role of HAI in liver metastases from CRC should, therefore, be revisited, using modern multidisciplinary therapeutic approaches and appropriate study designs. Recommendations for the design of future RCTs exploring HAI are provided.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.