Abstract

Seventy kindergarten children who had spent the year solving a variety of basic word problems were individually interviewed as they solved addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, multistep, and nonroutine word problems. Thirty-two children used a valid strategy for all nine problems and 44 correctly answered seven or more problems. Only 5 children were not able to answer any problems correctly. The results suggest that children can solve a wide range of problems, including problems involving multiplication and division situations, much earlier than generally has been presumed. With only a few exceptions, children's strategies could be characterized as representing or modeling the action or relationships described in the problems. The conception of problem solving as modeling could provide a unifying framework for thinking about problem solving in the primary grades. Modeling offers a parsimonious and coherent way of thinking about children's mathematical problem solving that is relatively straightforward and is accessible to teachers and students alike.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call