Abstract

In the 21st century, even with the advent of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD), the existing built environment still fails the neighborhood accessibility needs of people with disability. People with disabilities’ human right to the neighborhood is, at face value, enshrined in legislation and ‘much’ built environment accessibility legislation is in place. But, built environment accessibility practice has been, and continues to be, shaped by a hidden discourse based on theoretical underpinnings little understood by built environment practitioners. Similarly, built environment practitioners have little understanding of either the diversity of the human condition or the accessibility needs of people with disability. In Australia, the operationalization of built environment accessibility rights is, via opaque legislation, not necessarily reflective of the lived experience of people with disability, and weak in terms of built environment spatial coverage. Empirically, little is known about the extent of built environment inaccessibility, particularly neighborhood inaccessibility. Therefore, the question explored in this paper is: How might an understanding of models of disability and human rights inform the improvement of built environment accessibility, for people with disability, at a neighborhood scale? Literature related to disability and human rights theory, built environment accessibility legislation primarily using Australia as an example, and built environment accessibility assessment is drawn together. This paper argues that built environment practitioners must recognize the disabling potency of current built environment practice, that built environment practitioners need to engage directly with people with disability to improve understanding of accessibility needs, and that improved measure, at neighborhood scale, of the extent of existing built environment inaccessibility is required.

Highlights

  • Worldwide, a decade after the adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UN 2006), the existing built environment encompassing infrastructure, public buildings, commercial buildings and private dwellings still fails to meet the accessibility needs of people with disability

  • Through more than 30 years of transdisciplinary built environment experience, I have come to the realization that built environment practice and academia around built environment practice does not have a history of understanding disability, or human rights legislation pertaining to built environment accessibility, or people with disabilities’ lived experience of neighborhood accessibility

  • Due to the various factors discussed in the preceding paragraphs it is likely that built environmentaccessibility, in Australia at least and within the public realm and housing, will continue to be problematic if reliance on the current legislative framework is continued in isolation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A decade after the adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UN 2006), the existing built environment encompassing infrastructure, public buildings, commercial buildings and private dwellings still fails to meet the accessibility needs of people with disability. Through more than 30 years of transdisciplinary built environment experience, I have come to the realization that built environment practice and academia around built environment practice does not have a history of understanding disability, or human rights legislation pertaining to built environment accessibility, or people with disabilities’ lived experience of neighborhood accessibility. These three arenas appear to be rather siloed and the ‘neighborhood’, as a mediator between individual experience and community inclusion, is rarely considered. I propose a way forward to improving the accessibility of the existing built environment for people with disability at neighborhood scale

Models of Disability: A Built Environment Perspective
Charity Model of Disability
Medical Model of Disability
Social Model of Disability
Relational Model of Disability
Diversity Model of Disability
Human Rights Model of Disability
Disability Models: A Conundrum for Built Environment Practice?
Human Rights Legislation and the Built Environment
At International Level
Built Environment Accessibility Legislation
Assessing Neighborhood Accessibility
Disability Models
Built Environment Accessibility Rights Instruments
Improving Neighborhood Accessibility
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call