Abstract

In recent years, scholarship has begun to analyze the different forms whereby international laws are implemented in domestic settings. This article seeks to add another perspective to that enterprise. I suggest that insufficient attention has been paid to the potentially major contribution that domestic administrative agencies can make to the implementation of international law. Based on a number of case studies, I offer a model of bureaucratic internalization, analyzing the variables that affect the level of implementation of international law by administrative bodies. The model posits three possible paths to implementation: Harmony - international law is congruent with domestic law; Insulation - administrative agencies are barred by domestic politicians from interacting with international law; and Dialogue - international law interacts with domestic law. I argue that it is in situations of Dialogue that administrators play a major role in implementation, by both interpreting international law and acting as a vehicle of public instruction as to its meaning.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call