Abstract

Studies of type 1 ELMy H‐mode pedestals are carried out using 0 D and 1.5 D approaches. In the 0 D study, predicted pedestal temperatures are compared with 533 data points. The pedestal temperature models, with pedestal width based on magnetic and flow shear stabilization and neutral penetration, yield an RMSE of 32% and 53.4%, respectively, when compared with data. In the 1.5 D studies, the pedestal models are used together with a core transport model in the integrated predictive transport code JETTO. In simulations of type 1 ELMy H‐modes using the JETTO code, when a pedestal width model based on neutral penetration is used, the pedestal width and pressure are significantly under‐predicted and the ELM frequency obtained is that expected for type 3 rather than type 1 H‐mode plasmas. In contrast, the simulations using a pedestal width based on magnetic and flow shear stabilization yield better agreement for the pressure profiles and the ELM frequency is appropriate for type 1 ELMs. Consequently, the simula...

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call