Abstract

Abstract. Wildland fire propagation is studied in the literature by two alternative approaches, namely the reaction–diffusion equation and the level-set method. These two approaches are considered alternatives to each other because the solution of the reaction–diffusion equation is generally a continuous smooth function that has an exponential decay, and it is not zero in an infinite domain, while the level-set method, which is a front tracking technique, generates a sharp function that is not zero inside a compact domain. However, these two approaches can indeed be considered complementary and reconciled. Turbulent hot-air transport and fire spotting are phenomena with a random nature and they are extremely important in wildland fire propagation. Consequently, the fire front gets a random character, too; hence, a tracking method for random fronts is needed. In particular, the level-set contour is randomised here according to the probability density function of the interface particle displacement. Actually, when the level-set method is developed for tracking a front interface with a random motion, the resulting averaged process emerges to be governed by an evolution equation of the reaction–diffusion type. In this reconciled approach, the rate of spread of the fire keeps the same key and characterising role that is typical of the level-set approach. The resulting model emerges to be suitable for simulating effects due to turbulent convection, such as fire flank and backing fire, the faster fire spread being because of the actions by hot-air pre-heating and by ember landing, and also due to the fire overcoming a fire-break zone, which is a case not resolved by models based on the level-set method. Moreover, from the proposed formulation, a correction follows for the formula of the rate of spread which is due to the mean jump length of firebrands in the downwind direction for the leeward sector of the fireline contour. The presented study constitutes a proof of concept, and it needs to be subjected to a future validation.

Highlights

  • Modelling wildland fire propagation is a twofold challenging task because it is motivated by social and scientific reasons

  • Wildland fire propagation is studied in the literature by two alternative approaches, namely the reaction– diffusion equation and the level-set method

  • Turbulent hot-air transport and fire spotting are phenomena with a random nature and they are extremely important in wildland fire propagation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Modelling wildland fire propagation is a twofold challenging task because it is motivated by social and scientific reasons. Extremely important phenomena in wildland fire propagation are turbulent hot-air transport due to the turbulent nature of the atmospheric boundary layer that can affect fire–atmosphere interactions (Clark et al, 1996; Potter, 2002, 2012a, b; Linn and Cunningham, 2005; Cunningham and Linn, 2007; Sun et al, 2006; Clements et al, 2008; Filippi et al, 2009, 2011, 2013; Sun et al, 2009; Mandel et al, 2011; Forthofer and Goodrick, 2011), as well as the fire spotting phenomenon (Sardoy et al, 2007, 2008; Kortas et al, 2009; Perryman, 2009; Bhutia et al, 2010; Koo et al, 2010; Wang, 2011; Morgante, 2011; Perryman et al, 2013) Both processes have a random character; the fire front motion turns out to be random.

Reaction–diffusion equation modelling
General formulation of the level-set method
Application of the level-set method to the wildland fire propagation
Model discussion
Numerical results
Simulation set-up
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call