Abstract

Many brain imaging studies aim to measure structural connectivity with diffusion tractography. However, biases in tractography data, particularly near the boundary between white matter and cortical grey matter can limit the accuracy of such studies. When seeding from the white matter, streamlines tend to travel parallel to the convoluted cortical surface, largely avoiding sulcal fundi and terminating preferentially on gyral crowns. When seeding from the cortical grey matter, streamlines generally run near the cortical surface until reaching deep white matter. These so-called “gyral biases” limit the accuracy and effective resolution of cortical structural connectivity profiles estimated by tractography algorithms, and they do not reflect the expected distributions of axonal densities seen in invasive tracer studies or stains of myelinated fibres. We propose an algorithm that concurrently models fibre density and orientation using a divergence-free vector field within gyral blades to encourage an anatomically-justified streamline density distribution along the cortical white/grey-matter boundary while maintaining alignment with the diffusion MRI estimated fibre orientations. Using in vivo data from the Human Connectome Project, we show that this algorithm reduces tractography biases. We compare the structural connectomes to functional connectomes from resting-state fMRI, showing that our model improves cross-modal agreement. Finally, we find that after parcellation the changes in the structural connectome are very minor with slightly improved interhemispheric connections (i.e, more homotopic connectivity) and slightly worse intrahemispheric connections when compared to tracers.

Highlights

  • By tracing continuous paths along the distributions of axonal fibre orientations estimated for each voxel of the brain, diffusion MRI tractography aims to infer the trajectories of white matter fibre bundles

  • Within this gyral white matter we found the best-fit vector field that aligns with the primary eigenvector of the diffusion tensor and is both uniform and radial at the white/grey-matter boundary and mid-cortical surface

  • We present a model for the white matter in gyral blades, which reduces the overestimation of gyral connectivity and underestimation of sulcal connectivity by considering the shape of the gyrus when running tractography in the gyral white matter (Fig. 8)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

By tracing continuous paths along the distributions of axonal fibre orientations estimated for each voxel of the brain, diffusion MRI (dMRI) tractography aims to infer the trajectories of white matter fibre bundles. Estimating accurate connectivities in the cortex is limited by the strong bias of tractography streamlines to avoid sulcal fundi and walls and instead to terminate on gyral crowns and has been termed a “gyral bias” (Van Essen et al 2014; Reveley et al 2015; Schilling et al 2018; Sotiropoulos and Zalesky 2019) This gyral bias limits the accuracy and spatial resolution at which the termination points of white matter bundles can be localised or of grey matter to grey matter connection strength estimation. Our model aims to find a fibre configuration consistent with the diffusion MRI data that has both a uniform density in the white matter within gyral blades as well as a uniform distribution of fibre end-points within the cortical grey matter volume (Fig. 1D,E) This requires constraining the streamline orientation, and its density. With this set of geometric and anatomical constraints, the streamlines disperse towards the surface qualitatively similar to that seen in histology (Budde and Annese 2013; Van Essen et al 2014) and high-resolution diffusion MRI data (Miller et al 2011; Heidemann et al 2012; Sotiropoulos et al 2016)

Defining gyral white matter
Gyral white model overview
Dipole basis functions
Cost function and anatomical constraints
Interface with probabilistic tractography
Building whole-brain connectomes
Data and analysis
Results
Discussion
Model assumptions and limitations
Validation
Alternatives
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call