Abstract

Fog Computing is created to efficiently store and access data without the limitations challenging Cloud Computing deployments, such as network latency or bandwidth constraints. This is achieved by performing most of the processing on servers located as close as possible to where data is being collected. When mobile devices are equipped with limited resources and small capabilities, it would be convenient to make their associated computing and network resources follow them as much as possible. In this paper, migration process is studied and an algorithmic model is designed, selecting a generic Fat Tree architecture as the underlying topology, which may be useful to get a list of all devices being traversed through each of the redundant paths available.

Highlights

  • Fog Computing paradigm is characterised by the allocation of computing resources at the edge of the network, bringing the cloud computing assets closer to the end user [1]

  • When talking about moving Internet of Things (IoT) devices, this outlook is crucial as those devices lack resources of all kinds [5], such as those related before, and the use of a Virtual Machine (VM) to carry the computing assets of each device may help to cope with the issues regarding the resources [6]

  • The second kind of movement, the one related to VMs associated to moving IoT devices trying to follow them around, brings about the issue of trying to migrate a VM from the server hosting it to another one being located nearer to the actual position of the moving IoT device in order to facilitate the interaction between the device and its computing power, as a consequence of reducing the latency and bandwidth of such communications

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Fog Computing paradigm is characterised by the allocation of computing resources at the edge of the network, bringing the cloud computing assets closer to the end user [1] In this context, special attention may be set on its use in Internet of Things (IoT) deployments and, in IoT moving environments [2]. The second kind of movement, the one related to VMs associated to moving IoT devices trying to follow them around, brings about the issue of trying to migrate a VM from the server hosting it to another one being located nearer to the actual position of the moving IoT device in order to facilitate the interaction between the device and its computing power, as a consequence of reducing the latency and bandwidth of such communications.

LIVE VM MIGRATION PROCESS
CLOS NETWORKS
FAT TREE BEHAVIOUR FOR MODELLING
VM MIGRATION MODEL
GETTING ALL DEVICES ON REDUNDANT PATHS
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.