Abstract

To writing anything on a keyboard at all requires us to know first what to type, then to activate motor programmes for finger movements, and execute these. An interruption in the information flow at any of these stages leads to disfluencies. To capture this combination of fluent typing and typing hesitations, researchers calculate different measures from keystroke-latency data—such as mean inter-keystroke interval and pause frequencies. There are two fundamental problems with this: first, summary statistics ignore important information in the data and frequently result in biased estimates; second, pauses and pause-related measures are defined using threshold values which are, in principle, arbitrary. We implemented a series of Bayesian models that aimed to address both issues while providing reliable estimates for individual typing speed and statistically inferred process disfluencies. We tested these models on a random sample of 250 copy-task recordings. Our results illustrate that we can model copy typing as a mixture process of fluent and disfluent key transitions. We conclude that mixture models (1) map onto the information cascade that generate keystrokes, and (2) provide a principled approach to detect disfluencies in keyboard typing.

Highlights

  • Hesitations in keyboard typing are indicative of process delays on higher levels of activation

  • Data from keyboard typing involves a combination of two processes: (1) a smooth information flow from higher into lower levels of activation and (2) hesitations at the execution stage resulting from inhibitions on higher levels of activation

  • In this paper we present a series of statistical models that aim to capture this theoretical process underlying keyboard typing as a combination of fluent and disfluent keystroke transitions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hesitations in keyboard typing are indicative of process delays on higher levels of activation. In particular disfluencies are indicators of process demands that arise on higher levels of mental representation (Christiansen & Chater, 2016; Olive, 2014); for example when preplanning syntactic dependencies (Roeser et al, 2019) or retrieving the lexical entry of a word or its spelling (Torrance et al, 2016). This idea can be found in theoretical models of spoken language production (Bock & Ferreira, 2014), handwriting (Van Galen, 1991) and keyboard typing (Hayes, 2012). In this paper we present a series of statistical models that aim to capture this theoretical process underlying keyboard typing as a combination of fluent and disfluent keystroke transitions

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call