Abstract
Purpose – As higher education continues to be buffeted by challenges, college and university leaders must find a way to respond to these environmental forces. In the United States, accreditation plays an increasing role in the quality control and improvement process. The goal of this research is to gain a deeper understanding of this decision environment, and the stakeholders within that system, such that American higher education institutions may set and achieve goals more effectively. Research methodology – Grounded theory is utilized to create a conceptual framework depicting the American higher education stakeholder system. In addition to placing the actors within the system, this research is also designed to generate a stakeholder-focused institutional decision process model. Findings – When viewed in a systemic context, the accreditation process assumes a unique placement among the other critical stakeholders. With this understanding, higher education leaders may better understand, balance, and integrate the concerns of their various stakeholders, in a stakeholder-focused decision process. Research limitations – While integrating multiple theories, to depict the American higher education stakeholder system and a stakeholder-focused decision process, this research does not operationalize or undertake the empirical testing of these theoretical models. Practical implications – The influence of the dynamic external environment and the accreditation process combine to create extremely challenging decision-making conditions for higher education leaders. The ability to improve and balance the quality and ethical nature of decisions that impact their various stakeholders may assist these leaders in more accurately meeting both their institutional goals and the public good goals of higher education. Originality/Value – This study specifically seeks to integrate multiple theoretical constructs within the American higher education environment and accreditation process. The creation of a theoretical model that depicts not only the stakeholder environment but also a stakeholder-focused decision process may assist all higher education institutions.
Highlights
The 21st century has created increasingly challenging decision conditions for higher education leaders
In the face of increased globalization, technological change, rising costs, and decreases in governmental subsidization, colleges and universities must still create and deliver a quality education. This complex and dynamic environment has complicated the determination of what quality is within the higher education context, and how that quality is adapted and enhanced in these turbulent conditions
In American post-secondary education, quality has historically been assessed through the accreditation process (Young, et al, 1983)
Summary
The 21st century has created increasingly challenging decision conditions for higher education leaders. In the face of increased globalization, technological change, rising costs, and decreases in governmental subsidization, colleges and universities must still create and deliver a quality education. This complex and dynamic environment has complicated the determination of what quality is within the higher education context, and how that quality is adapted and enhanced in these turbulent conditions. Increasingly the argument has been advanced that business theory and solutions may assist higher education leaders in managing the environmental complexity (Hou, 2010). A review of the literature reveals that where there are benefits, the direct application, or even indirect translation, of these processes to the unique higher education context is more difficult than it seems on the surface
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
