Abstract

The spectral uncertainty refers to the diversity and variations of spectral characteristics within a single geographic object or across different objects of the same class. Usually, existing methods represent the spectral characteristics as precise single-valued curves. Thus, the spectral variations cannot be modeled, which further restricts the analysis and classification performance of remote sensing images. On the other hand, unsupervised methods have poor performance in classification and modeling uncertainty, while supervised methods need a large number of samples with high quality. Fuzzy semi-supervised clustering (FSSC) methods achieve a high accuracy with limited labelled samples. Thus, currently, FSSC methods attract more and more attention. This paper proposes a novel method to model the spectral uncertainty for very-high-resolution (VHR) images based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets (IT2 FSs), namely the hierarchical semi-supervising and weighted interval type-2 fuzzy c-means for objects (hierarchical SSW-IT2FCM-O) clustering method. In this method, the VHR image is segmented into image objects to reduce spectral uncertainty within objects. Spectral values, spectral indices and textures were weighted for object-based image classification. To further reduce spectral uncertainty across different objects of the same class, the spectral characteristics of land cover types were represented as banded curves with certain widths instead of precise single-valued spectral curves. The experimental results show that the banded spectral curves produced by the hierarchical SSW-IT2FCM-O can effectively model the spectral uncertainty of geographic objects. From the perspective of classification, four typical validity indices along with the confusion matrix and kappa coefficient were used to test the effectiveness of the hierarchical SSW-IT2FCM-O method, and these indices show that the presented method SSW-IT2FCM-O has greater classification accuracy than the existing FSSC methods and, more importantly, it requires smaller training samples than the existing methods.

Highlights

  • Land cover determination by remote sensing data is common and important

  • This study proposed a hierarchical method to model the spectral uncertainty for VHR images

  • This study proposed a hierarchical method to model the spectral uncertainty for VHR images based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets (IT2 FSs) with higher classification accuracy than existing Fuzzy semi-supervised clustering (FSSC) methods, namely, supervised fuzzy c-means (ssFCM), SIIT2-FCM and SKFCM-F

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Land cover determination by remote sensing data is common and important. Because the inherent fuzziness of geographical objects, and the sensor, data acquisition, processing, conversion and transmission processes may produce or propagate errors, uncertainty exists widely in remote sensing data [1]. For the object-based image analysis of very-high-resolution (VHR) remote sensing images, Remote Sens. 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 27 2 of 30. BSjeeccot ntod,othbejescpt.eSctormale cshtaurdaicetserhisatvices pofotinhteesdamouetlathnadt ctohveersptyecpteravlacruyrfvroesmoofbnjeecatrtloy oablljegcet.oSgorampehisctuodbijeescthsavareepboainntdesd wouitth thceartttahine srpaencgterasl [c1u,2r]v.eFsiogfunreea1rlyshaollwgseothgeradpihfifceroebnjceectsbeatrwe ebeanndtshewsitihngcleer-tvaainlureadngsepsec[1tr,2u]m. RFeofrerthteo bthanedfeirdstspanecdtrtuhmird, itqsuloawrtielresanodf gurpopuenrdboruefnldecatraienscere; ftehristostpheectfirrasltaatntrdibthuitredisqueaxrptirleesssoedf garsouanndinretflerevcatalnncuem; thbiesrsopnecetraaclh abttarnibdu.teUinsfeoxrpturnesasteedlya, sthaen isnintegrlvea-vl anluumedbesrpoenctreuacmh bdaoneds .nUont fcoorntutaniantesluy,cthhewsiidntghlei-nvfaolrumedatsiopnecotrfutmhe dboaensdneodt scpoencttariunmsu. SHedowbyevtheer,sethaeressptielcltsrianlgcleu-rvvaelus euds,esdo tbhyestehemsetharoedsstsitlilllscinangnleo-tveafflueecdti,vesolytmheosdeelmtheethsopdesctsratilll ucnacnenrtoatineftfyecotfivgeloygmraopdheicl tfheaetsuprecs.tral uncertainty of geographic features FFoorrththeeuunnsusuppeervrvisieseddmmeeththoodds,s,ththeefufuzzzyycc-m-meeaannss(F(FCCMM) )cclulustseterirningg[3[3] ]isisththeecclalassiscicaal lmmeeththooddaannddisis bbaasesdedonontytpyep-1e-f1uzfuzyzzsyetse[4ts].[S4p].eSctpreacltcruarlvceusravdeospatdedopbtyedthebyFCthMeaFrCe Mstilal preresctiislel psirnegclies-evasilnugedlec-vuarvlueesd, acnudrtvheess,eacnudrvtehsesmeacyudrvevesiamteagyredaetlvyiafrtoemgrtehaetrlyeaflrsopmecthrael rceuarlvseps eocftgraeol gcurarpvhesicaolfogbejoecgtrsa.pThhiecsael foabcjteocrtss. leTahdetsoe tfhaecltowrs clleaasdsifitcoatihoen laocwcurcalacyssoifficFaCtiMonanadcciutsraexcytenodf eFdCaMlgoarnitdhmits. eSxotmenedredseaarlcghoerritshimps.roSvoemde thresFeaCrMchebrys inmtpervoavletdytphee-2FCfuMzzbyysientste(rIvTa2l FtySp)ef-o2rfhuaznzydlsinetgs t(hITe2uFnSc)efrotarihnatyndolfinmgetmhebeurnscheirptaginratydeo,f sumcehmabseirnstheirpvagl rtaydpe,-2sfuuczhzyacs-minetaenrvsa(lITt2yFpCe-M2 ) f[u5z] zayndci-nmteravnasl-(vIaTl2uFeCdMpo) s[s5ib] ilaisntdic fiunztezryvac-l-mvaelaunesd (IpPoFsCsiMbi)li[s6t]i.c Tfuhzezsey mc-emtheoadns u(IsPeFtCwMo )fu[6z]z.ifiTehressde umrientghothdes culsaesstiwficoatfiuoznzipfrieorcsesdsu, rainndg tthheemcleamssbifeicrsahtiiopn gprardoceemssa, tarnixdotfhleamndemcobveerrshtyipegsrcaodnetmainatlroixwoefr laanndducopvper tmypemesbceornshtaiipnvloalwuers.aHndowupevpeerr, mtheemspbecrtsrhailp cuvarvlueessu. sHedowbyevtheer,sethaeressptielcltsrianlgcleu-rvvaelus euds,esdo tbhyestehemsetharoedsstsitlilllscinangnleo-tveafflueecdti,vesolytmheosdeelmtheethsopdesctsratilll ucnacnenrtoatineftfyecotfivgeloygmraopdheicl tfheaetsuprecs.tral uncertainty of geographic features

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call