Abstract

Transformation products (TP) of pesticides are found everywhere in the aquatic environment. Their dynamic formation and subsequent transport from agricultural fields to adjacent water bodies can be estimated by using environmental fate models, which is done in the registration process for plant protection products in the European Union. In this study, peer-reviewed applications of such models, the model complexity and their structure are documented and analysed. In total, 20 publications of 10 models – eight leaching models (GLEAMS, MACRO, RZWQM2, PEARL, PRZM, Pelmo, LEACHM, HYDRUS 1-D) and two catchment scale models (Zin-AgriTra, FRM) – were identified. The reviewed models greatly differ in their process complexity regarding the formation rate and the formation pathways of TPs.The major reason given for models failing to reproduce sampled TP concentrations in case studies was an erroneous substance transport, especially missing preferential flow simulation in soil. However, the contribution of TP formation processes to simulation uncertainty was not analysed at all in most of the studies. By comparing the structure of existing models, the state of knowledge on TP fate and requirements of TP fate assessment, the following recommendations were drawn: i) It is suggested that the models should be updated to reflect the current state of knowledge in process research, especially more complex transformation schemes and the formation of different TPs in different compartments, which was not included in most of the models. ii) Even though there are pesticide parent compound fate models at the catchment scale with a temporal resolution of one day, none of these models is able to simulate TP fate. Such models would enable scientists and authorities to estimate the environmental fate of TPs at the larger catchment scale or the regional scale. iii) To get over the assessment of the huge number of TPs formed in the environment, an integration of Quantitative Structure Properties Relationship models predicting TP fate characteristics, TP pathway prediction models and environmental fate models is suggested. This would allow for a largely automated and comprehensive assessment of the fate of a pesticide parent compound and all its TPs for regulatory purposes.

Highlights

  • Pesticides applied to agricultural fields dissipate with time

  • After more than two decades of research, pesticide transformation products (TPs) can no longer be called “emerging substances”, but they still pose a threat to many aquatic ecosystems

  • Even though there are eight leaching models and two catchment scale models described in the literature for the assessment of TP fate, only 20 individual studies have been published in which these models were tested or applied

Read more

Summary

Matthias Gassmann *

Specialty section: This article was submitted to Toxicology, Pollution and the Environment, a section of the journal Frontiers in Environmental Science

Fate of Pesticide Transformation Products From Plot to Catchment
INTRODUCTION
TRANSFORMATION EQUATIONS AND PATHWAYS IN CURRENT MODELS
OVERVIEW OF MODELS AND MODEL APPLICATIONS CONSIDERING TRANSFORMATION PRODUCTS
Field Scale Leaching Models
Catchment Scale Models
ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
Modelling Aim and Model Performance
Different TPs in environmental compartmentsa
Model Complexity
Number and Pathways of TPs
Findings
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call