Abstract

Wet path delay (WPD) for satellite altimetry has been provided from external sources, raising the need of converting this value between different altitudes. The only expression available for this purpose considers the same altitude reduction, irrespective of geographic location and time. The focus of this study is the modelling of the WPD altitude dependence, aiming at developing improved expressions. Using ERA5 pressure level fields (2010–2013), WPD vertical profiles were computed globally. At each location and for each vertical profile, an exponential function was fitted using least squares, determining the corresponding decay coefficient. The time evolution of these coefficients reveals regions where they are highly variable, making this modelling more difficult, and regions where an annual signal exists. The output of this modelling consists of a set of so-called University of Porto (UP) coefficients, dependent on geographic location and time. An assessment with ERA5 data (2014) shows that for the location where the Kouba coefficient results in a maximum Root Mean Square (RMS) error of 3.2 cm, using UP coefficients this value is 1.2 cm. Independent comparisons with WPD derived from Global Navigation Satellite Systems and radiosondes show that the use of UP coefficients instead of Kouba’s leads to a decrease in the RMS error larger than 1 cm.

Highlights

  • The presence of water in the atmosphere plays a key role in the Earth’s climate, being crucial for human life

  • The following wet path delay (WPD) were compared at the level of the ERA5 orography: the WPD computed using Equation (3) from temperature and humidity variables provided at pressure and model levels (37 and 137 vertical levels, respectively)

  • This way, improved WPD estimations lead to improved water surface height retrievals from satellite altimetry

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The presence of water in the atmosphere plays a key role in the Earth’s climate, being crucial for human life. These expressions are crucial for the retrieval of accurate WPD measurements over the latter regions, such as rivers and lakes, very important for obtaining accurate absolute water levels For this modelling, global WPD estimations at vertical profiles are required, which can be obtained from various sources, such as NWM, GNSS tomography, or radiosondes (RS). The last step of this study is an assessment (selecting ERA5 data not used in the modelling) and a validation (using radiosondes and GNSS data) This allows to inspect the significance of this improved modelling in the handling of wet path delays for satellite altimetry in regions such as coastal and inland waters.

Data and Methods
Data Sources for WPD Estimation
The Kouba Formulation
Modelling Using ERA5 Data on Pressure Levels
Assessment and Validation
Comparison between WPD Computed Using Different ERA5 Data
Modelling
Validation with RS and GNSS
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.