Abstract

This thesis is focused on the modular multilevel converter (MMC) for High-Voltage DC (HVDC) systems. It is an attempt to address the issues associated with the modelling, simulation, control, efficiency, and fault-handling capability of the MMC. Thus, to address the modelling of the MMC, a new and more accurate steady-state harmonic model is proposed. The proposed harmonic model is capable of predicting the amplitude of the harmonic components of the MMC arm voltages, submodule capacitor voltages, and arm currents. Further, based on the proposed harmonic model, a capacitor sizing method is proposed to determine the capacitance of the submodule capacitor for a desired level of voltage variation, without a need for numerical algorithms or graphs used by the existing methods. In addition, the proposed capacitor sizing method can accurately determine the required capacitance even if circulating currents are injected to mitigate dc voltage fluctuations. The thesis also proposes a simple equivalent-circuit-based simulation model for MMC-based HVDC systems, which assumes ideal submodule switches to speed up the simulation, but is nonetheless capable of capturing the transients as well as harmonic components of the voltages and currents. Further, the thesis proposes a simple compensation strategy that calculates the magnitude of the second harmonic component of an arm voltage, and uses the calculated value as a feedforward signal to cancel the circulating current of the corresponding MMC leg. The proposed feedforward compensation strategy, if combined with a closed-loop circulating current suppression strategy, greatly mitigates the possibility of control saturation and, also, results in better damped closed-loop dynamics. Finally, the thesis proposes two new MMC topologies for enhanced efficiency and dc-side fault handling capability. In the first proposed topology, that is the lattice modular multilevel converter (LMMC), the entire MMC arm is modified to accommodate networks that allow shortcuts between the arm capacitors, thus, reducing conduction power losses of the converter. In the second topology proposed, however, only the submodule is modified. In the proposed submodule topology, referred to as lattice submodule (LSM), the conduction power losses are decreased, as it is the case for the LMMC, with the difference that the voltage stress in the switches are also reduced. Keywords: Control, lattice modular multilevel converter, lattice submodule, modelling, modular multilevel converter, simulation model.

Highlights

  • 1.1 Background and MotivationA high-voltage dc (HVDC) system for bulk transmission of electric energy over large distances is more efficient and economical than an ac counterpart, especially if undersea cables are involved, HVDC transmission systems are on occasions the only choice, e.g., for interconnecting power systems of different frequencies, or for other strategic purposes

  • Since the SEC simulation model is focused in the converter dynamic behavior, it works when the SM topology is different than the full-bridge submodule (FBSM), but retains the same dc-side fault handling capability for disable switches

  • FBSM has been considered as the building block of the modular multilevel converter (MMC), due to its dc-side fault handling capability, given by the fact that, when the switches have their gate pulses blocked, the insolated-gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) anti-parallel diodes insert the submodule capacitor in the MMC arm, with its voltage polarity against the grid voltage

Read more

Summary

Location of the Inelfe HVDC transmission system, connecting Sta

1.8 Illustration of the Nemo HVDC transmission system, connecting Richborough, 1.9 Future site of the Ultranet HVDC transmission system, connecting Osterath to. 2.2 Main MMC SM topologies currently known:(a) Half-bridge submodule - HBSM; 2.11 First, second, and third harmonic components in the submodule capacitor volt-

2.12 First, second, and third harmonic components in the submodule capacitor voltix
Comparison between different methods for capacitor sizing assuming circulatxiv
Background and Motivation
Statement of Problem and Thesis Objectives
Modelling of the MMC and component sizing
Control of the MMC
Simulation of the MMC
Topologies and their dc-side fault handling capabilities
Thesis Outline
Foundation and assumptions regarding the MMC model
Fundamental harmonic MMC model
Open-loop MMC model
Proposed steady-state harmonic model of the MMC
Circulating current amplitude calculation
Capacitor voltage harmonic components calculation
Arm voltage harmonic components calculation
Modulating function calculation
Proposed submodule capacitor sizing method
Arm inductor sizing based on leg current resonance
Validation of the harmonic steady-state model
Submodule capacitor voltage variation
Modulation index
Circulating current, submodule capacitor voltage, and Arm voltage
Circulating current series convergence (resonance)
Validation of the capacitor sizing method
Summary and Conclusions
Simplified Equivalent-Circuit Simulation Model
Program code for the simplified equivalent-circuit simulation model
Modulation routine
Voltage balancing algorithm (VBA) routine
Submodule capacitor voltage calculation routine
Arm voltage calculation routine
Validation of the simplified equivalent-circuit simulation model
Case I - FBSM-based single-phase MMC inverter for M = 4
Case II - FBSM-based single-phase MMC rectifier for M = 4
Case III - FBSM-based three-phase MMC inverter for M = 8
Case IV - FBSM-based back-to-back three-phase MMC system for M = 400
Simulation Runtime Evaluation
Ac-side terminal current compensator strategies
PI compensator in dq-frame
Circulating current compensator
Circulating current suppressing compensator in dq-frame
Resonant compensator
Proposed feedforward control strategy for circulating current suppressing
Feedforward control strategy validation
Case I - Back-to-back HVDC system with dq-frame PI and feedforward control
Case II - Back-to-back HVDC system with resonant and feedforward control
Case III - Back-to-back HVDC system with feedforward control only
Proposed MMC
Normal operation
Operation under a dc-side fault
Switching Scheme of the LMMC
Capacitor connected to the last high-efficiency link: j = (M − 2) corresponding to C(M−2)
Capacitor connected to negative half-bridge: j = M corresponding to CM
Comparison between LMMC and MMC building blocks
Comparison between LMMC and MMC interconnections
Number of series-connected switches in an arm
F BSM H BSM
Analysis of Voltage Stress
Switch S u1
Switch S c1
Switch S d1
Simulation results for the LMMC
Case I - Single-phase LMMC inverter for M = 4
Case II - Single-phase LMMC inverter for M = 9
Case III - Three-phase LMMC inverter for M = 8
Validation of the model for power losses
Proposed submodule topology
Switching Scheme of the LSM
Power loss analysis
Voltage stress analysis
Advantages of the proposed topology
Simulation results for the LSM
Case I - Single-phase LSM inverter for M = 4
Case II - Three-phase LSM inverter for M = 8
Conclusions
Contributions
Future Work
Findings
VBA routine - controlled by TVBA if ((bal == 1)&&(z == 0))
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call