Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterised by a dynamic process of neurocognitive changes from normal cognition to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and progression to dementia. However, not all individuals with MCI develop dementia. Predicting whether individuals with MCI will decline (i.e. progressive MCI) or remain stable (i.e. stable MCI) is impeded by patient heterogeneity due to comorbidities that may lead to MCI diagnosis without progression to AD. Despite the importance of early diagnosis of AD for prognosis and personalised interventions, we still lack robust tools for predicting individual progression to dementia. Here, we propose a novel trajectory modelling approach based on metric learning (Generalised Metric Learning Vector Quantization) that mines multimodal data from MCI patients in the Alzheimer's disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort to derive individualised prognostic scores of cognitive decline due to AD. We develop an integrated biomarker generation- using partial least squares regression- and classification methodology that extends beyond binary patient classification into discrete subgroups (i.e. stable vs. progressive MCI), determines individual profiles from baseline (i.e. cognitive or biological) data and predicts individual cognitive trajectories (i.e. change in memory scores from baseline). We demonstrate that a metric learning model trained on baseline cognitive data (memory, executive function, affective measurements) discriminates stable vs. progressive MCI individuals with high accuracy (81.4%), revealing an interaction between cognitive (memory, executive functions) and affective scores that may relate to MCI comorbidity (e.g. affective disturbance). Training the model to perform the same binary classification on biological data (mean cortical β-amyloid burden, grey matter density, APOE 4) results in similar prediction accuracy (81.9%). Extending beyond binary classifications, we develop and implement a trajectory modelling approach that shows significantly better performance in predicting individualised rate of future cognitive decline (i.e. change in memory scores from baseline), when the metric learning model is trained with biological (r=-0.68) compared to cognitive (r=-0.4) data. Our trajectory modelling approach reveals interpretable and interoperable markers of progression to AD and has strong potential to guide effective stratification of individuals based on prognostic disease trajectories, reducing MCI patient misclassification, that is critical for clinical practice and discovery of personalised interventions.

Highlights

  • The Data and Publications Committee, in keeping with the publication policies adopted by the ADNI Steering Committee, here provide lists for standardized acknowledgement

  • Site Investigators represent the names of individuals at each recruiting site

  • All papers, including methodological papers, should have an acknowledgement list that consists of Infrastructure Investigators plus the FULL list

Read more

Summary

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT LIST FOR ADNI PUBLICATIONS

The Data and Publications Committee, in keeping with the publication policies adopted by the ADNI Steering Committee, here provide lists for standardized acknowledgement. The list consists of three parts: I. ADNI Infrastructure Investigators and Site Investigators, II. DOD ADNI Infrastructure Investigators and Site Investigators and III. ADNI Depression Infrastructure Investigators and Site Investigators. Infrastructure Investigators represent the names responsible for leadership and infrastructure. Site Investigators represent the names of individuals at each recruiting site. All papers, including methodological papers, should have an acknowledgement list that consists of Infrastructure Investigators plus the FULL list

Part A: Leadership and Infrastructure
Part B: Investigators By Site
DOD ADNI
ADNI Depression Part A
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call