Abstract
The activities for propane–propene mixture oxidation under lean conditions were found to be strongly different in the case of three-way Pt–Rh/Al 2O 3–CeO 2 catalysts prepared either by coimpregnation of the metallic salts (CI catalysts) or by an original method of successive impregnations with an intermediary reducing treatment (SI catalysts). Based upon the analysis of results of catalytic tests and physical characterisations including EXAFS at the Pt edge, it was shown previously that such a different behaviour for propane oxidation could easily be explained. The formation of clusters of inactive Pt–Rh alloys of a rather homogeneous composition was suggested for CI catalysts while active bimetallic catalysts obtained by the SI preparation procedure were modelled by Pt and Rh clusters more or less mixed together. To achieve the complete description of the metallic species (especially for SI catalysts), the influence of rhodium loading and the nature of the metallic precursors were examined by studying the different catalysts by EXAFS mainly at the Pt edge but also at the Rh edge.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
