Abstract
AbstractDesign of several liquid‐liquid extraction columns — packed, pulsed‐packed, pulsed‐plate, Oldshue‐Rushton columns and the rotating disc contactor — was attempted utilizing available correlations for drop size, holdup of dispersed phase, flooding velocities, mass transfer coefficients and axial mixing coefficients. Correlations in many cases were vaguely defined and often based on very limited data. Results indicated that for given flow rates and extraction efficiency, the height of a packed or Oldshue‐Rushton column must be considerably greater than the predicted minimum heights of the other three columns, which were comparable considering the limited data utilized in the developed correlations. A critical evaluation of the correlations should be carried out to guide the further experimental effort required to confirm the utility of the axial dispersion model in liquid‐liquid extraction column design. Extension of the theory to include drop size variation is highly desirable.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
