Abstract

Abstract. Modelling of land surface temperature (LST) is conducted to be able to explain the spatial and temporal variations of LST using a set of explanatory variables. LST in a previous study was modelled as a linear function of vegetation cover and built up cover as quantified by the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and the normalized difference built-up index (NDBI), respectively, and other variables, namely, albedo, solar radiation (SR), surface area-volume ratio (SVR), and skyview factor (SVF). SVF requires a digital surface model of sufficient resolution while SVR computation needs 3D volumetric features representing buildings as input. These inputs are typically not readily available. In addition, NDVI and NDBI do not fully describe the spatial variability of vegetation and built-up cover within an LST pixel. In this study, PlanetScope images (3m resolution) were processed to provide soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI) and VgNIR Built-up Index (VgNIR-BI) layers. The following gray level co-occurrence matrices (GLCM) were generated from SAVI and VgNIR-BI: Mean, Variance, Homogeneity, Contrast, Dissimilarity, Entropy, Second Moment, and Correlation. Random Forest regression was run for several cases with different combinations of GLCM features and non-GLCM variables. Using GLCM features alone yielded less satisfactory models. However, the use of additional GLCM features in combination with other variables resulted in lower MSE and a slight increase in R2. Considering NDBI, NDVI, SAVI_GLCM_contrast, VgNIR-BI_GLCM_contrast, VgNIR-BI_GLCM_dissimilarity, and SAVI_GLCM_contrast only, the RF model yielded an MSE=1.657 and validation R2=0.822. While this 6-variable model’s performance is slightly less, the need for DSM and 3D building models which are necessary for the generation of SVF and SVR layers is eliminated. Exploratory regression (ER) was also conducted. The best 6-variable ER model (Adj. R2=0.79) consists of SVR, NDBI, NDVI, SAVI_GLCM_second_moment, VgNIR-BI_GLCM_mean, and VgNIR-BI_GLCM_entropy. In comparison, OLS regression using the 6 non-GLCM variables yielded an Adj. R2=0.691. The results of RFR and ER both indicate the value of GLCM features in providing valuable information to the models of LST. LST is best described through a combination of GLCM features describing relatively homogenous areas (i.e., dominant land cover or low-frequency areas) and the more heterogenous areas (i.e., edges or high-frequency areas) and non-GLCM variables.

Highlights

  • As cities continue to densify and expand, urban heat islands (UHI) are increasingly becoming larger and more persistent

  • The main objective of this study is to evaluate the usefulness of texture measures derived from high-resolution satellite image in estimating Landsat-derived land surface temperature (30-m resolution)

  • RF model of these 6 variables yielded an MSE=1.657 and validation R2=0.822. While this 6-variable model’s performance is slightly less compared to Case 1, the need for DSM and 3D building models which are necessary for the generation of skyview factor (SVF) and surface area-volume ratio (SVR) layers is eliminated

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As cities continue to densify and expand, urban heat islands (UHI) are increasingly becoming larger and more persistent. Surface urban heat islands are examined using land surface temperatures (LST) estimated from thermal bands of satellite systems such as Landsat, MODIS, and Sentinel-3. Beyond examining the spatio-temporal variation of LST, efforts have been made in modelling or estimating LST. These are attempts to understand how LST are affected by the mix of environmental variables and to possibly estimate LST for different future scenarios (e.g., urban expansion, decrease of vegetation cover). Variables describing the distribution of land use land cover types, materials, urban morphology, and solar irradiance, among others, have been used in previous studies to model LST (see Alcantara et al, 2019, Baloloy et al, 2019, Cañete et al, 2019)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.