Abstract

What makes cognition “advanced” is an open and not precisely defined question. One perspective involves increasing the complexity of associative learning, from conditioning to learning sequences of events (“chaining”) to representing various cue combinations as “chunks.” Here we develop a weighted graph model to study the mechanism enabling chunking ability and the conditions for its evolution and success, based on the ecology of the cleaner fish Labroides dimidiatus. In some environments, cleaners must learn to serve visitor clients before resident clients, because a visitor leaves if not attended while a resident waits for service. This challenge has been captured in various versions of the ephemeral reward task, which has been proven difficult for a range of cognitively capable species. We show that chaining is the minimal requirement for solving this task in its common simplified laboratory format that involves repeated simultaneous exposure to an ephemeral and permanent food source. Adding ephemeral–ephemeral and permanent–permanent combinations, as cleaners face in the wild, requires individuals to have chunking abilities to solve the task. Importantly, chunking parameters need to be calibrated to ecological conditions in order to produce adaptive decisions. Thus, it is the fine-tuning of this ability, which may be the major target of selection during the evolution of advanced associative learning.

Highlights

  • In an effort to understand the evolution of cognition, a wide range of studies has been focused on identifying cognitive abilities in animals that appear “advanced” and exploring the ecological conditions that could possibly favour their evolution (e.g., [2,3,4,5,6,7])

  • We explored to what extent different densities and frequencies of client types select for different tendencies to form chunks, and how such different tendencies may affect the cleaners’ ability to solve the market problem

  • It is simple and tractable, but it involves a case where the function of chunking and its fitness consequences are well understood and are ecologically relevant, the adaptive and maladaptive chunks can be clearly identified (i.e., VR versus RV), and it can be studied experimentally and in relation to variable ecological conditions (e.g., [54,60,61])

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In an effort to understand the evolution of cognition, a wide range of studies has been focused on identifying cognitive abilities in animals that appear “advanced” (a term that is commonly used but is loosely defined [1]) and exploring the ecological conditions that could possibly favour their evolution (e.g., [2,3,4,5,6,7]). Accurate navigation [8], social manipulations [9], or flexible communication [10], for example, may all be considered advanced cognitive abilities. Mapping these skills along phylogenetic trees and their relation to social or ecological conditions (e.g., [11,12]) does not explain how such abilities evolved through incremental.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call