Abstract
Two simple approaches for assessing global radiation in complex terrain are tested and compared. A parameterisation scheme for global radiation based on cloud cover observations was compared with interpolation of measured global radiation values from the Austrian climate observation network. Interpolation appears to be a useful method for a station density which has been available after 1992 in Austria (about 1000 km 2/station). In that case interpolation is superior to parameterisation. The quality of interpolated data quickly drops with height and for elevations above 1500 m neither method delivers useful results.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
