Abstract
The expansion of non-industrial private forests (NIPF) in Ireland is unique in the European context in which the almost doubling of forest cover within the last thirty years has taken place largely on farmland. This is not surprising as Ireland has some of the highest growth rates for conifers in Europe and also has a large proportion of land which is marginal for agriculture but highly productive under forests. However, in recent years, afforestation in Ireland as in many European countries has fallen well short of policy targets. As the farm afforestation decision essentially involves an inter-temporal land use change, farmers need comprehensive information on forest market returns under different environmental conditions and forest management regimes. This paper describes the systematic development of a cohort forest bio-economic model which examines financially optimal afforestation and management choices. Simulating a range of productivity and harvesting scenarios for Sitka spruce, we find that different objectives result in different outcomes. We see substantial differences between the biologically optimal rotation, the reduced rotation in common usage and the financially optimal rotation which maximises net present value and find that the results are particularly sensitive to the choice of management and methodological assumptions. Specifically, we find that better site productivity and thin versus no-thin options result in shorter rotations across all optimisations, reinforcing the usefulness of this type of financial modelling approach. This information is critical for future policy design to further incentivise afforestation of agricultural land.
Highlights
In recent years, afforestation in Ireland as in many European countries has fallen well short of policy targets (Eurostat, 2013)
We want to assess the sensitivity of the results in Forest Bio-Economic System model (ForBES) to methodological and forestry management choices and to assess differences in optimal rotation lengths for different optimisation criteria
In this paper we describe the development of the Teagasc Forest Bio-Economic System (ForBES) to examine
Summary
Afforestation in Ireland as in many European countries has fallen well short of policy targets (Eurostat, 2013). This comes at a time when the importance of the ecosystem services provided by forests is increasingly valued (EC 2013). On the one hand this is not surprising as Ireland has some of the highest growth rates for conifers in Europe and has a large proportion of land which is marginal for agriculture but highly productive under forests (Farrelly et al, 2011). The rate of expansion is surprising given the disincentive presented by the permanency of the land use change decision. Farmers are unfamiliar with the long crop rotation and consequential uncertainty around future forest returns
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
