Abstract

The Late Triassic and Early Toarcian extinction events are both associated with greenhouse warming events triggered by massive volcanism. These Mesozoic hyperthermals were responsible for the mass extinction of marine organisms and resulted in significant ecological upheaval. It has, however, been suggested that these events merely involved intensification of background extinction rates rather than significant shifts in the macroevolutionary regime and extinction selectivity. Here, we apply a multivariate modelling approach to a vast global database of marine organisms to test whether extinction selectivity varied through the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic. We show that these hyperthermals do represent shifts in the macroevolutionary regime and record different extinction selectivity compared to background intervals of the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic. The Late Triassic mass extinction represents a more profound change in selectivity than the Early Toarcian extinction but both events show a common pattern of selecting against pelagic predators and benthic photosymbiotic and suspension-feeding organisms, suggesting that these groups of organisms may be particularly vulnerable during episodes of global warming. In particular, the Late Triassic extinction represents a macroevolutionary regime change that is characterized by (i) the change in extinction selectivity between Triassic background intervals and the extinction event itself; and (ii) the differences in extinction selectivity between the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic as a whole.

Highlights

  • The Late Triassic to Early Jurassic interval contains two major extinction events: the Late Triassic mass extinction (LTE; ca 201 Ma) [1] and the Early Toarcian extinction (EToE; ca 187 Ma) [2]

  • We provide the first multivariate analysis of ecological selectivity during the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic, in order to determine whether there are any substantial differences between the LTE and EToE hyperthermal events and the periods of normal background extinction, and whether a shift in macroevolutionary regime occurred

  • We aim to test the following hypotheses: (i) do certain ecological variables correlate with higher extinction risk during the LTE and EToE hyperthermal events, (ii) are similar trends recorded in both past hyperthermals despite differences in starting conditions and magnitude, and (iii) are similar trends recorded during background times, or do the LTE and EToE hyperthermals represent significantly different extinction selectivity?

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Late Triassic to Early Jurassic interval contains two major extinction events: the Late Triassic mass extinction (LTE; ca 201 Ma) [1] and the Early Toarcian extinction (EToE; ca 187 Ma) [2]. There has been less research on selectivity during the EToE hyperthermal, there is some evidence for loss of reef taxa [5], selection against endemic taxa [12], the motile benthos [35], infaunal organisms [12,17,35,36], as well as higher levels of extinction in the restricted basins of north-west Tethys, northeast Panthalassa [35], and the Boreal Ocean [2,36] as well as in the Southern Hemisphere [37] Whether this represents a macroevolutionary regime shift compared to Jurassic background extinction is unknown. We aim to test the following hypotheses: (i) do certain ecological variables (e.g. latitudinal distribution, habitat preference, feeding mode, and calcification) correlate with higher extinction risk during the LTE and EToE hyperthermal events, (ii) are similar trends recorded in both past hyperthermals despite differences in starting conditions and magnitude, and (iii) are similar trends recorded during background times, or do the LTE and EToE hyperthermals represent significantly different extinction selectivity?

Methods
Results
Findings
Discussion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.