Abstract

This paper investigates car ownership dynamics based on irregularly spaced panel data of Denmark. The data originates from a national travel survey, where a fraction of the respondents are recurrent due to the random sampling scheme of the survey. While this creates a rich sample collected over a long time period and with desired variation between the panel observations, it introduces an estimation challenge due to the irregular spacing of the panel observations. This challenge is addressed by estimating changes in car ownership based on a generalised ordered logit model in which the irregular nature of the spacing between panel observations is controlled by including panel-specific weights in the log-likelihood function. The estimated model, which is formulated as a first-difference approach, includes several variables explaining the change of car ownership. Specifically, it is found that accessibility improvements, measured as the number of people that can be reached by public transport within a certain time interval, significantly reduce the likelihood of acquiring additional cars in the observation period. In line with the literature, it is also confirmed that changes in income, number of adults and driver’s licenses within the household have a significant impact on household car ownership changes.

Highlights

  • IntroductionLongitudinal data is essential for modelling the relationship between individual’s choices (such as car ownership), life course events and exogenous factors that change over time

  • Longitudinal data is essential for modelling the relationship between individual’s choices, life course events and exogenous factors that change over time

  • This paper investigates car ownership dynamics based on irregularly spaced panel data of Denmark

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Longitudinal data is essential for modelling the relationship between individual’s choices (such as car ownership), life course events and exogenous factors that change over time. Scheiner and Holz-Rau, 2013a; Clark et al, 2016a; de Haas et al, 2018), pseudo panels composed by aggregated cross-sectional data from different years While short panels are easier to collect they do not constitute a basis for examining the often lagged reactions to life course events (Dargay and Vythoulkas, 1999). Pseudo panels do not have this limitation as these are often based on repeated cross-sectional data. In the process of constructing pseudo panels data is aggregated over individuals with similar characteristics, which leads to information loss and potential aggregation bias in the resulting models (King, 1997). Retrospective surveys are based on how individuals recall past events and such data is often inaccurate and biased (Oakil et al, 2014)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call