Abstract

The assessment of forest ecosystem services can quantify the impact of these services on human life and is the main basis for formulating a standard of compensation for these services. Moreover, the calculation of the indirect value of forest ecosystem services should not be ignored, as has been the case in some previous publications. A low compensation standard and the lack of a dynamic coordination mechanism are the main problems existing in compensation implementation. Using comparison and analysis, this paper employed accounting for both the costs and benefits of various alternatives. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method and the Pearl growth-curve method were used to adjust the results. This research analyzed the contribution of each service value from the aspects of forest produce services, ecology services, and society services. We also conducted separate accounting for cost and benefit, made a comparison of accounting and evaluation methods, and estimated the implementation period of the compensation standard. The main conclusions of this research include the fact that any compensation standard should be determined from the points of view of both benefit and cost in a region. The results presented here allow the range between the benefit and cost compensation to be laid out more reasonably. The practical implications of this research include the proposal that regional decision-makers should consider a dynamic compensation method to meet with the local economic level by using diversified ways to raise the compensation standard, and that compensation channels should offer a mixed mode involving both the market and government.

Highlights

  • The indirect value of forest ecosystem services is an important consideration for appropriate compensation standards, which has become the consensus of different countries around the world.In America and many European countries, long-term research has been carried out concerning the issue of the evaluation of forest ecosystem services and their compensation

  • This study investigated the coupling relationship between the economic value of forest ecosystem services and the current eco-compensation standard

  • In the process of compensation, the actual computation should depend on the specific circumstances due to the complicated forest economy, and it is unnecessary to account for all conditions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The indirect value of forest ecosystem services is an important consideration for appropriate compensation standards, which has become the consensus of different countries around the world. In America and many European countries, long-term research has been carried out concerning the issue of the evaluation of forest ecosystem services and their compensation. Governments and scholars in this research area have focused mainly on the strategy of payment for ecosystem services (PES) and have studied the relationship between forest ecosystem services and compensation standards. PES was first used to connect the ecosystem with beneficial social activities and to determine the estimated cost to replace lost ecosystem services [1,2]. With each term defined from the perspective of supply or demand, market and non-market values are recognized in both spatial and temporal dimensions

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call