Abstract

Most erosion models applied at basin scale are based on spatially aggregated representation, for example, in a space subdivision of the surfaces to which behavior is assumed homogeneous (sub-basins, hydrological units, etc.). This approach leads to a desirable simplification of the calculations, but presents difficulties in addressing problems related to sediment transport and identification of sediment source areas, which should be treated by a continuous spatial representation. Spatially distributed models, however, allow a more accurate approach to this problem, at the cost of an increased computational complexity. The objective of this work is the calibration and validation of the model WATEM/SEDEM, an empirical-conceptual spatially distributed model, to predict erosion and sediment yield in two watersheds in the Central Spanish Pyrenees: i) the watershed of the Barasona Reservoir (1504 km2), which is drained by the Ésera and Isábena Rivers, the model calibration and validation was based on the depositional history of the Barasona Reservoir and suspended sediment records over 3 years (May 2005–May 2008) at the outlet of the Isábena River; ii) the experimental Arnás catchment (2.84 km2), the model calibration was performed based on a dataset of soil redistribution rates derived from point 137Cs inventories, allowing capture differences per land use in the main model parameters. The validation process was carried with the registration of six years of suspended sediment at the outlet of the Arnás catchment. The calibration process for watershed of the Barasona Reservoir showed the problem you have when trying to calibrate the parameters of transport capacity with a single variable (the export of sediment to the basin outlet), making impossible to find a single set of parameters that optimize the error function, making it necessary to adopt a compromise solution. For the experimental Arnás catchment the model calibration processes using spatially distributed sediment yield derived from 137Cs inventories allowed calibrating the empirical parameters of transport capacity in a satisfactory way, finding a single combination of values that optimizes the error function. These results show that the calibration parameters of transport capacity are a fundamental aspect of the model WATEM/SEDEM and other similar models. To obtain a reliable estimate of the spatial distribution of erosion and sediment transport requires a calibration and validation by means of spatially distributed data of soil loss, which in turn allows a calibration of spatially distributed parameters concerning transport capacity

Highlights

  • Modelización espacialmente distribuida de la erosión y el transporte de sedimento fundamental aspect of the model WATEM/SEDEM and other similar models

  • To obtain a reliable estimate of the spatial distribution of erosion and sediment transport requires a calibration and validation by means of spatially distributed data of soil loss, which in turn allows a calibration of spatially distributed parameters concerning transport capacity

  • Using 137Cs measurements to validate the application of the AGNPS and ANSWERS erosion and sediment yield models in two small Devon catchments

Read more

Summary

Introducción

La atención científica y el destino de recursos financieros para el desarrollo de proyectos de investigación se están orientando cada vez más hacia una mejor comprensión y predicción de las consecuencias del cambio global sobre la erosión y la dinámica en la producción de sedimentos. El principal objetivo del presente estudio ha consistido en un análisis comparativo de los resultados obtenidos en el proceso de calibración y validación de WATEM/SEDEM, un modelo empírico-conceptual espacialmente distribuido para predecir erosión y la producción de sedimentos en dos cuencas del Pirineo aragonés : i) la cuenca del embalse de Barasona (1504 km2), drenada por el Río Ésera e Isábena, donde, Modelización espacialmente distribuida de la erosión y el transporte de sedimento para el proceso de calibración se utilizó el registro de 3 años de sedimentos en suspensión (mayo 2005-mayo 2008) a la salida de la subcuenca del Río Isábena y, para la validación, se utilizó el registro histórico de sedimentación del embalse de Barasona; y, ii) la cuenca experimental de Arnás (2.84 km2), donde se contó para la calibración con datos espacialmente distribuidos de tasas de erosión y sedimentación derivadas de inventarios de Cs137, más el registro de siete años de sedimento en suspensión a la salida de la cuenca de Arnás para el proceso de validación. El enfoque seguido es transferible a otras regiones del mundo

Materiales y métodos
Cuenca del embalse de Barasona
Cuenca experimental de Arnás
Resultados
Findings
Discusión y conclusiones
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call