Abstract
Due to fire suppression efforts, many areas have developed conditions whereby fire susceptibility is high. To help identify those areas and improve fire management, two fire susceptibility models were developed for a study area in southeastern Idaho. Both models used the same intrinsic parameters (topography, fuel characteristics, etc). The difference between the models is the first used expert knowledge to weight input parameters, whereas the second relied upon fuzzy systems to derive the weighting. Comparing the resulting output models indicates that the first more accurately capture fire susceptibility. This lends credibility to the use of expert knowledge in geo-spatial modeling.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
