Abstract

Crown profile models were developed for north, east, south, and west crown directions of dominant trees, intermediate trees, and suppressed trees in planted stands of Larix olgensis Henry in Northeast China. A total of 139 sample trees were randomly selected, and all branches of each tree were measured. A segmented power equation, segmented polynomial equation, modified Weibull equation, and Kozak equation were selected as the candidate models. A traditional approach that did not consider the differences between tree status and crown directions was also developed. Three steps were conducted to analyze the effect of tree status (dominant, intermediate, and suppressed tree) and crown direction (north, east, south, and west) on the crown profiles using a dummy variable approach. Step 1 considered only tree status, Step 2 considered only crown direction, and Step 3 took both tree status and crown direction into account. Nonlinear mixed-effects model was used to express the effect of individual tree level on crown shape, and was also compared to the ordinary least-squares and generalized least-squares model. The results demonstrated that the modified Kozak equation showed good performance in the crown profile description. The nonlinear mixed-effects model significantly improved the model performance compared to the ordinary least-squares and generalized least-squares model. There were differences among the crown profiles among the four directions of dominant, intermediate, and suppressed trees. South-oriented crowns had the tendency to be the largest, which is likely to be mainly a result of light conditions. The competition status of the subject tree was the main reason leading to an asymmetric crown. Individual trees with strong competition levels had smaller crowns.

Highlights

  • Crown size exhibits an intimate relationship to species diversity and ecosystem stability; it is directly related to the growth and yield of individual trees within a specified stand and provides a reference for decision-making in forest management [1]

  • Our study results determined that it is not reasonable to consider the crown profile of an individual tree to be a symmetrical shape, as crown asymmetries occur in trees due to differences in light conditions and competitive neighboring trees around the subject trees

  • The modified Kozak (1988) model showed excellent performance in describing the crown profile, as it satisfies the conditions in which the crown radius equals zero at the tree tip and has only one inflection point within the entire crown

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Crown size exhibits an intimate relationship to species diversity and ecosystem stability; it is directly related to the growth and yield of individual trees within a specified stand and provides a reference for decision-making in forest management [1]. The light conditions at different latitudes is the most decisive factor in determining the crown profile in comparison to other factors, such as the competition index, water and nutrient variations [2], or genetics and the physical environment [3]. Various variables have been widely used to reflect the gross crown size, such as crown length or crown ratio [5], crown width [6], crown surface area, crown volume [7], and leaf area and biomass distribution [8]. Crown length and crown width focus on the crown features in vertical and horizontal directions, respectively. Crown volume, crown surface area, and leaf features are Forests 2017, 8, 139; doi:10.3390/f8050139 www.mdpi.com/journal/forests

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call