Abstract
Abstract Tree mortality was modeled through time in uneven-aged northern hardwood stands managed under a selection system using long-term remeasurement data. Two models were fitted and compared: a traditional logistic regression model that predicted the probability of individual tree mortality over discrete time periods and a logistic regression model estimated using generalized estimating equations (GEEs) to account for autocorrelation in the longitudinal data. Model evaluation was based on the mean prediction error, mean absolute prediction error, variance of prediction errors, and mean square error calculated using an independent validation data set. The GEE model produced smaller evaluation statistics, especially for the smaller diameter classes. The predicted probability of mortality from the two models was compared with the observed mortality across 5-cm diameter classes for two time periods. Our results indicate that the GEE model was better able to capture the change in the probability of mortality over time, especially for the smaller diameter classes, than the more traditional logistic model.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.