Abstract
Pork processing plants were apparent hotspots for SARS-CoV2 in the spring of 2020. As a result, the swine industry was confronted with a major occupational health, financial, and animal welfare crisis. The objective of this work was to describe the epidemiological situation within processing plants, develop mathematical models to simulate transmission in these plants, and test the effectiveness of routine PCR screening at minimizing SARS-CoV2 circulation. Cumulative incidence of clinical (PCR-confirmed) disease plateaued at ~2.5% to 25% across the three plants studied here. For larger outbreaks, antibody prevalence was approximately 30% to 40%. Secondly, we developed a mathematical model that accounts for asymptomatic, pre-symptomatic, and background “community” transmission. By calibrating this model to observed epidemiological data, we estimated the initial reproduction number (R) of the virus. Across plants, R generally ranged between 2 and 4 during the initial phase, but subsequently declined to ~1 after two to three weeks, most likely as a result of implementation/compliance with biosecurity measures in combination with population immunity. Using the calibrated model to simulate a range of possible scenarios, we show that the effectiveness of routine PCR-screening at minimizing disease spread was far more influenced by testing frequency than by delays in results, R, or background community transmission rates. Testing every three days generally averted about 25% to 40% of clinical cases across a range of assumptions, while testing every 14 days typically averted 7 to 13% of clinical cases. However, the absolute number of additional clinical cases expected and averted was influenced by whether there was residual immunity from a previous peak (i.e., routine testing is implemented after the workforce had experienced an initial outbreak). In contrast, when using PCR-screening to prevent outbreaks or in the early stages of an outbreak, even frequent testing may not prevent a large outbreak within the workforce. This research helps to identify protocols that minimize risk to occupational safety and health and support continuity of business for U.S. processing plants. While the model was calibrated to meat processing plants, the structure of the model and insights about testing are generalizable to other settings where large number of people work in close proximity.
Highlights
Almost 9000 U.S meat, poultry, and agricultural workers tested positive for SARS-CoV2 from March through May 2020 [1], and at the time, the numerous outbreaks that occurred at meat processing plants were amongst the largest and fastest growing workplace outbreaks in the country [2]
The swine industry was confronted with a major occupational health, financial, and animal welfare crisis; at the time, it was feared that up to 700,000 pigs would need to be culled per week due to stalled and backlogged production chains [5], and U.S meat production fell by 20% by the end of April [6]
Based on confirmed PCR-positives, epidemic curves of the daily number and cumulative proportion of clinical cases plotted for each plant show that Plant C experienced the largest outbreak, which plateaued at ~25% of the workforce reporting clinical disease
Summary
Almost 9000 U.S meat, poultry, and agricultural workers tested positive for SARS-CoV2 from March through May 2020 [1], and at the time, the numerous outbreaks that occurred at meat processing plants were amongst the largest and fastest growing workplace outbreaks in the country [2]. In some cases, >25% of workers tested positive [4], leading to plant closures or reduced operations affecting 25% of U.S meat processing capacity during April and May, 2020 [2]. The swine industry was confronted with a major occupational health, financial, and animal welfare crisis; at the time, it was feared that up to 700,000 pigs would need to be culled per week due to stalled and backlogged production chains [5], and U.S meat production fell by 20% by the end of April [6]. Similar to other high-density places of work and study, worker health and safety remains an ongoing concern
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
