Abstract
This paper employs a Logistic Smooth Transition Regression to model economic reforms in CEECs. Allowing for a transition in both trend and level we examine the response of both GDP and labor productivity to reforms. While our results suggest that allowing for structural breaks in most CEECs is preferred to either a trend stationary or a unit root process, they also suggest little evidence of a positive impact of reforms on GDP growth. Results using labor productivity provide stronger support for an impact of reforms, suggesting that labor supply adjustments have been important in increasing overall efficiency. Our results also suggest that differences in the speed in which reforms were undertaken had little impact upon the depth and length of the transitional recession, or upon the response of long-term growth to reforms. Journal of Comparative Economics 35 (1) (2007) 57–86.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
