Abstract

Reservoir heterogeneity is a key geological problem that restricts oil and gas exploration and development of clastic rocks from the early to late stages. Existing reservoir heterogeneity modeling methods such as multiple-point geostatistics (MPS) can accurately model the two-dimensional anisotropic structures of reservoir lithofacies. However, three-dimensional training images are required to construct three-dimensional reservoir lithofacies anisotropic structures models, and the method to use reservoir heterogeneity model of fewer-dimensional to obtain a three-dimensional model has become a much-focused research topic. In this study, the outcrops of the second member of Qingshuihe Formation (K1q2) in the northwestern margin of the Junggar Basin, which are lower cretaceous rocks, were the research target. The three-dimensional reservoir heterogeneity model of the K1q2 outcrop was established based on the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) digital outcrops model and MPS techniques, and the “sequential two-dimensional conditioning data” (s2Dcd) method was modified based on a sensitivity parameter analysis. Results of the parametric sensitivity analysis revealed that the isotropic multigrid simulations demonstrate poor performance because of the lack of three-dimensional training images, conditioning data that are horizontally discrete and vertically continuous, and distribution of lithofacies that are characterized by large horizontal continuities and small thicknesses. The reservoir lithofacies anisotropic structure reconstructions performed well with anisotropic multigrids. The simulation sequence of two-dimensional surfaces for generating the three-dimensional anisotropic structure of reservoir lithofacies models should be reasonably planned according to the actual geological data and limited hard data. In additional to this, the conditional probability density function of each two-dimensional training image should be fully utilized. The simulation results using only one two-dimensional section will have several types of noises, which is not consistent with the actual geological background. The anisotropic multigrid simulations and two-dimensional training image simulation sequence, proposed in this paper as “cross mesh, refinement step by step”, effectively reduced the noise generated, made full use of the information from the two-dimensional training image, and reconstructed the three-dimensional reservoir lithofacies anisotropic structures models, thus conforming to the actual geological conditions.

Highlights

  • The spatial heterogeneity of reservoir parameters is called reservoir heterogeneity [1]

  • The former mainly uses the variogram of two points as a tool to reflect reservoir heterogeneity, which maybe faithful to the hard data, but cannot characterize the complex geometry and spatial shape accurately

  • The workflow of generating a digital outcrop using a unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) can be broken down into the following steps: (1) obtain digital photographs with an overlap rate of over 60% of the outcrops, and record the location, elevation, and deflection angle in these photographs; (2) identify key points in each of the photographs; (3) match the key points in the photographs; (4) automatic aerial triangulation (AAT) and estimated camera pose based on beam-block adjustment (BBA); (5) process the directional photographs and obtain the cloud; and (6) generate the mesh and digital outcrops [43]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The spatial heterogeneity of reservoir parameters (porosity, permeability, and lithofacies) is called reservoir heterogeneity [1]. Traditional geological modeling methods can be divided into two categories: pixel-based, two-point geostatistics (such as truncated Gaussian simulations [4,5,6] and sequential indicator simulations [7,8,9]; and object-based methods [10,11,12,13], which encompass marked-point processes [14] and Boolean methods [15]) The former mainly uses the variogram of two points as a tool to reflect reservoir heterogeneity, which maybe faithful to the hard data, but cannot characterize the complex geometry (such as the shape of river channel) and spatial shape accurately. The object of this study is the second member of the lower Cretaceous

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.