Abstract
Kellen and Klauer (this issue) discussed a number of limitations in Ragni et al. (Psychological Bulletin, 144, 779–796 2018) evaluation of theories of the Wason selection task. In a reply, Ragni and Johnson-Laird (this issue) raise a number of counterarguments along with new arguments against the Inference-Guessing Theory. We argue that much of their reply hinges on a number of misconceptions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
