Abstract

ABSTRACTObjective: To evaluate to what extent an inefficient statistical model affects the study of genetic factors in extra-intestinal manifestations of Crohn's disease (CD) and how clinical predictions can be improved using more adequate techniques.Materials: Extra-intestinal manifestations were studied in 152 CD patients. Three sets of variables were considered: (1) disease characteristics – presenta­tion, behavior, location; (2) generic risk factors – age, gender, smoke and familiarity; and (3) genetic polymorph­isms of the NOD2, CD14, TNF, IL12B, and IL1RN genes, whose involvement in CD is known or suspected.Methods: Six statistical classifiers and data mining models were applied: (1) logistic regression as a bench­mark; (2) generalized additive model; (3) projection pursuit regression; (4) linear dis­criminant analysis, (5) quadratic discriminant analysis; (6) artificial neural networks one-layer feed forward. Models were selected using the Akaike Information criterion and their accuracy was compared with several indexes.Results: Extra-intestinal manifestations occurred in 75 patients. The model with clinical variables only selected familiarity, gender, presentation, and behavior as signif­icantly associated with extra-intestinal manifestations, whereas when the genetic factors were also included familiarity was no longer significant, being replaced by the NOD2, TNF, and IL12B single nucleotide polymorph­isms. The projection pursuit regression performed best in predicting individual outcomes (Kappa statistics 0.078 [SE 0.09] without and 0.108 [SE 0.075] with genetic informa­tion). One-layer artificial neural networks did not show any particular improvement in terms of model accuracy over non-linear techniques.Conclusions: The correct identification of factors assoc­iated with extra-intestinal symptoms in CD, in particular the genetic ones, is highly dependent on the model chosen for the analysis. By using the most sophist­icated statistical models, the accuracy of prediction can be strengthened by 10–64%, compared with linear regression.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.