Abstract
Globally, there has been a renewed focus on addressing gestational weight gain (GWG). In Australia, the Department of Health pregnancy care guidelines recommend women be offered routine weighing and receive brief nutritional and physical activity support during antenatal care visits. Women gaining weight outside the Institute of Medicine (IOM)’s weight gain reference values are further recommended to be referred to a dietitian. However, professional and organizational barriers, including an absence of weight gain referral pathways and limited workforce resources, exist with the translation and scaling of these recommendations into practice. This study aimed to explore patterns of GWG among a cohort of Australian pregnant women and to determine if pregnancy weight gains of above or below 2 kg or 5 kg in the second and third trimester can be used to predict total GWG outside recommendations. Sensitivity, specificity, negative, and positive likelihood ratios were calculated. The most predictive time point was 24 weeks’ gestation using the minimum weight change parameter of +/−2 kg, demonstrating reasonable sensitivity (0.81, 95% CI 0.61–0.83) and specificity (0.72, 95% CI 0.61–0.83), resulting in 55% (n = 72/131) of the cohort qualifying for dietetic referral. Given the current health service constraints, a review of dietetic services within maternity care is warranted.
Highlights
In 2009, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) published revised guidelines for gestational weight gain (GWG) in response to the increasing prevalence of overweight and obesity within the United States (US) population [1]
The patterns of GWG indicated that women with a pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 exhibited weight gains below 2 kg and 5 kg across all WATCH study visits
Further research is required to test the referral process, our model suggests that there is potential for weight gains of 2 kg or greater identified at two consecutive second trimester time points occurring at approximately 19 and 24 weeks’ gestation to be used to identify women at risk for high total GWG and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)
Summary
In 2009, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) published revised guidelines for gestational weight gain (GWG) in response to the increasing prevalence of overweight and obesity within the United States (US) population [1]. A. 2017 systematic review and meta-analysis, including over 1.3 million women, found GWG’s above the IOM guidelines was associated with an increased risk of large for gestational age infants (odds ratio (OR) 1.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.76–1.95), macrosomia Low GWG was associated with small for gestational age infants (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.44–1.64) and preterm birth (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.32–2.20) [2].
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.