Abstract
In recent years, it has become increasingly apparent that antisense transcription plays an important role in the regulation of gene expression. The circadian clock is no exception: an antisense transcript of the mammalian core-clock gene PERIOD2 (PER2), which we shall refer to as Per2AS RNA, oscillates with a circadian period and a nearly 12 h phase shift from the peak expression of Per2 mRNA. In this paper, we ask whether Per2AS plays a regulatory role in the mammalian circadian clock by studying in silico the potential effects of interactions between Per2 and Per2AS RNAs on circadian rhythms. Based on the antiphasic expression pattern, we consider two hypotheses about how Per2 and Per2AS mutually interfere with each other's expression. In our pre-transcriptional model, the transcription of Per2AS RNA from the non-coding strand represses the transcription of Per2 mRNA from the coding strand and vice versa. In our post-transcriptional model, Per2 and Per2AS transcripts form a double-stranded RNA duplex, which is rapidly degraded. To study these two possible mechanisms, we have added terms describing our alternative hypotheses to a published mathematical model of the molecular regulatory network of the mammalian circadian clock. Our pre-transcriptional model predicts that transcriptional interference between Per2 and Per2AS can generate alternative modes of circadian oscillations, which we characterize in terms of the amplitude and phase of oscillation of core clock genes. In our post-transcriptional model, Per2/Per2AS duplex formation dampens the circadian rhythm. In a model that combines pre- and post-transcriptional controls, the period, amplitude and phase of circadian proteins exhibit non-monotonic dependencies on the rate of expression of Per2AS. All three models provide potential explanations of the observed antiphasic, circadian oscillations of Per2 and Per2AS RNAs. They make discordant predictions that can be tested experimentally in order to distinguish among these alternative hypotheses.
Highlights
Messenger RNAs, which encode proteins, are transcribed in the 5’-to-3’ direction from one strand of a structural gene, under the control of an upstream promoter region
A better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying circadian rhythms will undoubtedly improve the treatment of human health problems related to circadian dysrhythmias
Because it is important to know how interactions between Per2 and Per2AS may affect circadian gene expression, we have carried out a mathematical modeling study of two possible mechanisms for these interactions
Summary
Messenger RNAs, which encode proteins, are transcribed in the 5’-to-3’ direction from one strand (the sense strand) of a structural gene, under the control of an upstream promoter region. Antisense transcripts are rarely translated into proteins; their primary effects are in regulating the expression of a ‘target’ transcript [3,4,5,6]. Because of their complementary sequences, the natural target of an antisense transcript is typically its sense counterpart and vice versa. Interactions between these transcripts are possible post-transcriptionally [7,8,9] and during the transcription process [10,11,12]. Difficulties in simultaneously transcribing RNAs from both strands of the same genomic locus, termed transcriptional interference, can mutually repress the expression of both sense and antisense transcripts [13]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
