Modeling the influence of body size on V(O2) peak: effects of model choice and body composition.

Abstract

This study examined the bivariate relationship between peak oxygen uptake (V(O2) peak); l/min) and body size in adult men (n = 1,314, age 17-66 yr), using both "simple" and "full" iterative nonlinear allometric models. The simple model was described by V(O2) peak = M(b) (or FFM(b)) exp(c SR-PA) exp(a + d age) epsilon (where M is body mass in kg; FFM is fat-free mass in kg; SR-PA is self-reported physical activity; epsilon is a multiplicative error term; and exp indicates natural antilogarithms). The full model was described by V(O2) peak = M(b) (or FFM(b)) exp(c SR-PA) exp(a + d age) + e (epsilon), where e is a permitted Y-intercept term. The M exponent obtained from simple allometry was 0.65 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.59-0.71], suggestive of a curvilinear relationship constrained to pass through the origin. This "zero Y-intercept" assumption was examined via the full allometric model, which revealed an M exponent of 1.00 (95% CI, 0.7-1.31), together with a positive Y-intercept term (e) of 1.13 (95% CI, 0.54-1.73). The FFM exponents were not significantly different from unity in either the simple or full allometric models. It appears that the curvilinearity of the simple allometric model (using total M) is fictitious and is due to the inappropriate forcing of the regression line through the origin. Utilizing FFM as the body-size variable revealed a linear relationship between body size and V(O2) peak, irrespective of model choice. We conclude that the population mass exponent for V(O2) peak is close to unity.