Abstract

Abstract. The feedback between aerosol and meteorological variables in the atmospheric boundary layer over the North China Plain (NCP) is analyzed by conducting numerical experiments with and without the aerosol direct and indirect effects via a coupled meteorology and aerosol/chemistry model (WRF-Chem). The numerical experiments are performed for the period of 2–26 January 2013, during which a severe fog–haze event (10–15 January 2013) occurred, with the simulated maximum hourly surface PM2.5 concentration of ~600 ug m−3, minimum atmospheric visibility of ~0.3 km, and 10–100 hours of simulated hourly surface PM2.5 concentration above 300 ug m−3 over NCP. A comparison of model results with aerosol feedback against observations indicates that the model can reproduce the spatial and temporal characteristics of temperature, relative humidity (RH), wind, surface PM2.5 concentration, atmospheric visibility, and aerosol optical depth reasonably well. Analysis of model results with and without aerosol feedback shows that during the fog–haze event aerosols lead to a significant negative radiative forcing of −20 to −140 W m−2 at the surface and a large positive radiative forcing of 20–120 W m−2 in the atmosphere and induce significant changes in meteorological variables with maximum changes during 09:00–18:00 local time (LT) over urban Beijing and Tianjin and south Hebei: the temperature decreases by 0.8–2.8 °C at the surface and increases by 0.1–0.5 °C at around 925 hPa, while RH increases by about 4–12% at the surface and decreases by 1–6% at around 925 hPa. As a result, the aerosol-induced equivalent potential temperature profile change shows that the atmosphere is much more stable and thus the surface wind speed decreases by up to 0.3 m s−1 (10%) and the atmosphere boundary layer height decreases by 40–200 m (5–30%) during the daytime of this severe fog–haze event. Owing to this more stable atmosphere during 09:00–18:00, 10–15~January, compared to the surface PM2.5 concentration from the model results without aerosol feedback, the average surface PM2.5 concentration increases by 10–50 μg m−3 (2–30%) over Beijing, Tianjin, and south Hebei and the maximum increase of hourly surface PM2.5 concentration is around 50 (70%), 90 (60%), and 80 μg m−3 (40%) over Beijing, Tianjin, and south Hebei, respectively. Although the aerosol concentration is maximum at nighttime, the mechanism of feedback, by which meteorological variables increase the aerosol concentration most, occurs during the daytime (around 10:00 and 16:00 LT). The results suggest that aerosol induces a more stable atmosphere, which is favorable for the accumulation of air pollutants, and thus contributes to the formation of fog–haze events.

Highlights

  • The occurrence of fog–haze events has been more frequent in recent years in the developing regions and mega-cities of China

  • The results suggest that aerosol induces a more stable atmosphere, which is favorable for the accumulation of air pollutants, and contributes to the formation of fog–haze events

  • Using the RAMS (Regional Atmospheric Modeling System) and CMAQ (Community Multi-scale Air Quality) modeling system (RAMS–CMAQ), Han et al (2013) showed that the low visibility in December 2010 over the North China Plain (NCP) was primarily caused by a high mass burden of PM2.5 as a result of local pollutant accumulation, long-range transport, and SO24− and NO−3, decreasing visibility by contributing 40 to 45 % of the total extinction coefficient value

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Large emission sources emit primary aerosols and the precursors of secondary aerosols (Zhang et al, 2009; Street et al, 2003), resulting in high loads of aerosols and many aerosol species (e.g., sulfate (SO24−), nitrate (NO−3 ), ammonium (NH+4 ), black carbon (BC), organic carbon (OC), and dust) over the NCP This is the main reason for the deterioration of visibility and fog–haze events through light extinction (Sun et al, 2006; Chan and Yao, 2008). Sun et al (2014) showed that the PM1 mass concentration during 10–14 January in Beijing ranged from 144 to 300 μg m−3, which was 10 times higher than that during clean periods They concluded that stagnant meteorological conditions, coal combustion, secondary production, and regional transport were the four main factors driving the formation and evolution of haze pollution in Beijing during wintertime.

WRF-Chem model
Numerical experiments and emissions
Emissions
Observation data
Results and discussion
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call