Abstract
Abandonment in queues has long been recognized as having a significant impact on system performance. Nevertheless, our empirical understanding of the key drivers for abandonment, particularly in observable systems, is limited. Most models of abandonment assume that it occurs after a length of time sampled from an exogenous distribution, with no dependence on the system. However, discrete-event simulation, a commonly used tool for decision making in service systems, permits much more complex (and hence accurate) models of abandonment than those simply based on time in system. To better inform our understanding of abandonment and guide our modeling of this behavior, we study three operational drivers of abandonment, namely, waiting time, queue-length, and service rate. Using operational data from a hospital emergency department, we show that all three factors affect a patient’s propensity for leaving the waiting area without being seen by a physician (LWBS). Further, these factors interact with each other in a non-linear fashion. We examine the shape of the hazard function for LWBS behavior. A constant hazard function, which is equivalent to an exponential patience distribution, is commonly assumed for abandonment, but is not an accurate model for such systems. However, the Weibull distribution, particularly when parameterized by appropriate covariates, does provide a good .t. We use these findings together with a numerical study to make recommendations for simulating LWBS behavior.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.