Abstract

Controlling for imperfect detection is important for developing species distribution models (SDMs). Occupancy‐detection models based on the time needed to detect a species can be used to address this problem, but this is hindered when times to detection are not known precisely. Here, we extend the time‐to‐detection model to deal with detections recorded in time intervals and illustrate the method using a case study on stream fish distribution modeling. We collected electrofishing samples of six fish species across a Mediterranean watershed in Northeast Portugal. Based on a Bayesian hierarchical framework, we modeled the probability of water presence in stream channels, and the probability of species occupancy conditional on water presence, in relation to environmental and spatial variables. We also modeled time‐to‐first detection conditional on occupancy in relation to local factors, using modified interval‐censored exponential survival models. Posterior distributions of occupancy probabilities derived from the models were used to produce species distribution maps. Simulations indicated that the modified time‐to‐detection model provided unbiased parameter estimates despite interval‐censoring. There was a tendency for spatial variation in detection rates to be primarily influenced by depth and, to a lesser extent, stream width. Species occupancies were consistently affected by stream order, elevation, and annual precipitation. Bayesian P‐values and AUCs indicated that all models had adequate fit and high discrimination ability, respectively. Mapping of predicted occupancy probabilities showed widespread distribution by most species, but uncertainty was generally higher in tributaries and upper reaches. The interval‐censored time‐to‐detection model provides a practical solution to model occupancy‐detection when detections are recorded in time intervals. This modeling framework is useful for developing SDMs while controlling for variation in detection rates, as it uses simple data that can be readily collected by field ecologists.

Highlights

  • Species distribution models (SDMs) are widely used for research on biodiversity patterns and processes, and for informing conservation action and wildlife management (Guisan and Thuiller 2005)

  • Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

  • Our work expanded the time-to-detection model (Garrard et al 2008, 2013) to deal with detections collected in time intervals and illustrated its value for modeling species distribution using stream fish as a case study

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Species distribution models (SDMs) are widely used for research on biodiversity patterns and processes, and for informing conservation action and wildlife management (Guisan and Thuiller 2005) Despite their value, SDMs may often be biased due to the use of datasets including false absences (Lobo et al 2010; Kery 2011; Dorazio 2012; Lahoz-Monfort et al 2014) because failure to detect a species where it is present is a common source of error in biological surveys (Guillera-Arroita et al 2014; and references therein). Time to Detection and Interval-Censored Data development (Chen et al 2013; Kery et al 2013; LahozMonfort et al 2014)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call