Abstract

The threat to human lives and the economic losses due to high seismic vulnerability of non-engineered traditional masonry infills subjected to earthquakes have been highlighted by several post-seismic surveys and experimental and numerical investigations. In the past decades, researchers have proposed different techniques to mitigate problems related to the seismic vulnerability of traditional masonry infills; however, a viable, practical, and universally accepted solution has not been achieved yet. Among the possible innovative techniques, the one using ductile (or pliable) infills have shown promising results in recent experimental tests. These infills have provided, indeed, a reduced in-plane stiffness and a very high displacement capacity. The research units of the University of Pavia/EUCENTRE (Italy) and the University of Newcastle (Australia) have proposed two different systems for ductile masonry infill based on dividing the masonry panel into a number of segments interconnected through horizontal sliding joints. The ductile masonry infill proposed by the University of Pavia subdivides the masonry panel into four horizontal subpanels using specially engineered sliding joints and presents a deformable mortar at the infill/structure interface, while the one conceived by the University of Newcastle is made of mortar-less specially shaped masonry units capable of sliding on all bed joints. The experiments conducted on the two novel systems have permitted the calibration of two numerical macromodels capable to replicate the overall in-plane seismic response of these ductile masonry infills. One approach is based on a spring model, as usually adopted for traditional masonry infill; the other calibrates the response of a semi-active damper model. The calibrated macromodel approaches have been adopted to demonstrate the enhanced behavior and the reduction of the seismic vulnerability of reinforced concrete (RC) framed structures with the employment of the ductile infills in comparison to structures with non-engineered masonry infills.

Highlights

  • The in-plane and the out-of-plane seismic responses of traditional masonry infill solutions, where the panels are constructed in full adherence with the reinforced concrete (RC) frame without any gap or fastening around the boundaries and subsequently the complete hardening of the RC members, have revealed some limits that are dependent on the mechanical characteristics and the type of masonry of the infill

  • Post-seismic inspections and research studies have continuously highlighted a series of issues related to the seismic response of traditional rigidly attached masonry infills

  • The seismic response of the ductile infills has been studied through experimental campaigns at the University of Pavia and the University of Newcastle, where two different deformable infill solutions with horizontal sliding and deformable joints have been separately developed

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The in-plane and the out-of-plane seismic responses of traditional masonry infill solutions, where the panels are constructed in full adherence with the reinforced concrete (RC) frame without any gap or fastening around the boundaries and subsequently the complete hardening of the RC members, have revealed some limits that are dependent on the mechanical characteristics and the type of masonry of the infill. The interface between the top of the infill and the steel frames has been filled with selfexpandable foam and cement grout, and their influence on the cyclic behavior of the SIM panel has been considered

Summary of the Experimental Response
CONCLUSIONS
Findings
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call