Abstract

There is a great challenge in combining soil proximal spectra and remote sensing spectra to improve the accuracy of soil organic carbon (SOC) models. This is primarily because mixing of spectral data from different sources and technologies to improve soil models is still in its infancy. The first objective of this study was to integrate information of SOC derived from visible near-infrared reflectance (Vis-NIR) spectra in the laboratory with remote sensing (RS) images to improve predictions of topsoil SOC in the Skjern river catchment, Denmark. The second objective was to improve SOC prediction results by separately modeling uplands and wetlands. A total of 328 topsoil samples were collected and analyzed for SOC. Satellite Pour l’Observation de la Terre (SPOT5), Landsat Data Continuity Mission (Landsat 8) images, laboratory Vis-NIR and other ancillary environmental data including terrain parameters and soil maps were compiled to predict topsoil SOC using Cubist regression and Bayesian kriging. The results showed that the model developed from RS data, ancillary environmental data and laboratory spectral data yielded a lower root mean square error (RMSE) (2.8%) and higher R2 (0.59) than the model developed from only RS data and ancillary environmental data (RMSE: 3.6%, R2: 0.46). Plant-available water (PAW) was the most important predictor for all the models because of its close relationship with soil organic matter content. Moreover, vegetation indices, such as the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), were very important predictors in SOC spatial models. Furthermore, the ‘upland model’ was able to more accurately predict SOC compared with the ‘upland & wetland model’. However, the separately calibrated ‘upland and wetland model’ did not improve the prediction accuracy for wetland sites, since it was not possible to adequately discriminate the vegetation in the RS summer images. We conclude that laboratory Vis-NIR spectroscopy adds critical information that significantly improves the prediction accuracy of SOC compared to using RS data alone. We recommend the incorporation of laboratory spectra with RS data and other environmental data to improve soil spatial modeling and digital soil mapping (DSM).

Highlights

  • Reliable information on the spatial distribution of soil physical and chemical properties is required for sustainable land management and precision agriculture [1, 2]

  • The soil organic carbon (SOC) content in the entire catchment ranged from 0.7% to 31.6%, showing that the study area was heterogeneous with large variations in SOC

  • The present study presents a novel approach for upscaling laboratory spectral wavelengths and features from point to regional scale and combining these with multi-spectral images to predict SOC

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Reliable information on the spatial distribution of soil physical and chemical properties is required for sustainable land management and precision agriculture [1, 2]. Thompson [6] proposed the STEP-AWBH model (S, soil; T, topography; E, ecology; P, parent material; A, atmosphere; W, water; B, biotic; H, human) to determine soil properties and classes. Based on this model, they declared that the “B” factor representing vegetation cover, land use and other ecophysiological biotic properties could be assessed through spectral indices derived from passive remote sensing imagery. They declared that the “B” factor representing vegetation cover, land use and other ecophysiological biotic properties could be assessed through spectral indices derived from passive remote sensing imagery These data can be acquired from agencies, for instance the Satellite Pour l’Observation de la Terre (SPOT) and Landsat Data Continuity Mission images. These techniques are useful for mapping large areas since it reduces the need for costly soil sampling and laboratory analyses

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.